Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Procreation vs. Consumption

Harms and Benefits

Bibliographic Data

ID11266023
AuthorsKalle Grill (0000-0002-1689-0648, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume45
Issue3
Pages265-286
Publication date2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0163-4275 • E-ISSN: 2153-7895
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5840/enviroethics20238860
OpenAlexW4385882775
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited28

Recently, it has been argued by several scholars that we have moral reasons to limit our procreation due to the harmful environmental consequences it entails. These calls for procreative restraint are typically made in relation to other lifestyle choices, such as minimizing driving and air travel. In such comparisons, it is assumed that the environmental impact of procreation encompasses the lifetime consumption of the child created, and potentially that of further descendants. After an overview of these arguments, I go on to provide an examination of the main benefits of procreation, in relation to those of consumption, i.e., other lifestyle choices. My normative assumption is that benefits hold moral relevance, alongside harms. Procreation may benefit procreators and may provide more collective benefits. Some benefits tend to preempt the environmental impact associated with procreation. I conclude that the benefits of procreation are substantial and typically greater than those of consumption

Economics · Environmental ethics · Normative · Political science · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Law · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

  • The carbon footprint of procreation

    Open Access•Emmanuel Pont•Environmental Research Letters•2026

  • Harm, Insignificant Effects, and the Morality of Procreation

    Open Access•Felix Pinkert•The Journal of Ethics•2025

  • It’s time to take the antinatalist variable seriously

    Open Access•Diego Borbón•Biodemography and Social Biology•2026

  • Procreative Prerogatives and Climate Change

    Open Access•Felix Pinkert, Martin Sticker•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2025

  • My Child, Whose Emissions

    Open Access•Serena Olsaretti, Isa Trifan•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2025

  • Climate Change and the Moral Agent

    Elizabeth Cripps•Climate Change And The Moral…•2013

  • Why Worry About Future Generations?

    Samuel Scheffler•Why Worry About Future Generations?•2018

  • Reason in a Dark Time

    Dale Jamieson•Reason In A Dark Time Why The…•2014

  • Critique

    P R Ehrlich, John P Holdren•Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists•1972

  • What Should We Do About Future Generations?

    Open Access•Yew-Kwang Ng, Yew‐kwang Ng•Economics and Philosophy•1989

  • Value and Population Size

    Thomas Hurka•Ethics•1983

  • Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?

    Open Access•Richard A Easterlin•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•1995

  • A safe operating space for humanity

    Open Access•Johan Rockström, Will Steffen et al.•Nature•2009

  • Weighing Lives

    John Broome•WEIGHING LIVES.•2004

  • Famine, Affluence, and Morality

    Peter Singer•Global Justice•2017

  • Why Citizens Should Vote

    Open Access•Alvin I Goldman•Social Philosophy and Policy•1999

  • The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being

    Guy Fletcher•Routledge Handbook of Philosophy…•2015

  • Procreation, Footprint and Responsibility for Climate Change

    Open Access•Felix Pinkert, Martin Sticker•The Journal of Ethics•2021

  • A Legacy of Harm? Climate Change and the Carbon Cost of Procreation

    Open Access•Daniel Burkett•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2021

  • The Environmental Impact of Overpopulation

    Trevor Hedberg•Environmental Impact of…•2020

  • Parenthood and Happiness

    Open Access•Thomas Hansen•Social Indicators Research•2012

  • Is Procreation Special

    Open Access•I Robeyns•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2021

  • Climate ethics and population policy

    Open Access•Philip Cafaro•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2012

  • Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals

    Open Access•Paul A Murtaugh, Michael G Schlax•Global Environmental Change•2009

  • Limits to growth

    Open Access•J I Mills, P C Emmi•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2005

  • My Emissions Make No Difference”

    Joakim Sandberg•Environmental Ethics•2011

  • Happiness

    Open Access•Mikko Myrskylä, R Margolis•Demography•2014

  • An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics

    Open Access•Alan Montefiore•Philosophical Books•1962

  • The Value of Existence

    Gustaf Arrhenius, Włodek Rabinowicz et al.•Oxford Handbook of Value Theory•2015

  • Children as negative externalities

    Open Access•Serena Olsaretti•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2017

  • Children as Public Goods

    Open Access•Serena Olsaretti•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2013

  • Population axiology

    Open Access•Hilary Greaves•Philosophy Compass•2017

Unique citing works5
Citations per year5
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae