Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Russia’s Failed Nuclear Coercion Against Ukraine

Bibliographic Data

ID11269305
AuthorsAnna Clara Arndt (0009-0009-3362-792X, Charles University, corresponding author), Liviu Horovitz (0000-0003-3471-2009, Charles University), Michal Onderco (0000-0001-9911-3782, Charles University)
Year2023
Volume46
Issue3
Pages167-184
Publication date2023-07-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Washington Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0163-660X • E-ISSN: 1530-9177
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0163660x.2023.2259665
OpenAlexW4387621457
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited9

During the summer of 1945, Harry Truman intuitively came to believe in the effectiveness of nuclear coercion. The Soviet Union would have to cave in to US nuclear might, the President thought. Washington could organize Europe (and the world) as it saw fit against Moscow's wishes, and regional conventional superiority if necessary, given that nuclear mushroom clouds would soon reveal American destructive supremacy. He was flabbergasted a few months later, when the Soviets proved unimpressed by US nuclear allusions. 1 By the end of the decade, with Moscow's atomic arsenal barely nascent, the US government forfeited nuclear coercion and chose to invest massively in

Coercion (linguistics · Linguistics · Political science · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Philosophy

  • Hope the Russians Love Their Children Too”

    Open Access•Michal Smetana, Michal Onderco•Journal of Global Security Studies•2025

  • Weapons of Mass Deterrence

    Open Access•Julian Wucherpfennig, Christian Gläßel et al.•Journal of Global Security Studies•2026

  • Third or “Second and a Half”? Continuity, Path Dependence, and the Third Nuclear Age

    Open Access•Jan Ludvík•Global Policy•2025

  • Historical Analogies, Nuclear Mythmaking, and Coercive Diplomacy in Putin’s Russia

    Valentina Feklyunina•Communist and Post-Communist…•2025

  • Current Russian perspectives on strategic stability and deterrence through the prism of strategic culture

    Nicolò Fasola, Derek Averre•Journal of Strategic Studies•2026

  • Oppenheimer and public support for arms control negotiations

    Open Access•Tom W Etienne, Tom Etienne et al.•Italian Political Science…•2026

  • A Preponderance of Power

    Melvyn P Leffler•A Preponderance of Power•1992

  • Making Concurrence-Seeking Visible

    Open Access•Franz Eder•Foreign Policy Analysis•2017

  • Lessons (to be) learned? Germany’s Zeitenwende and European security after the Russian invasion of Ukraine

    Tobias Bunde•Arms Control•2022

  • How Strong Is the Nuclear Taboo Today

    Nina Tannenwald•The Washington Quarterly•2018

  • Nuclear Incoherence

    Dmitry Adamsky, Dmitry Dima Adamsky•Journal of Strategic Studies•2014

  • Russian Strategic Deterrence

    Open Access•Kristin Ven Bruusgaard•Survival•2016

  • Bargaining, Nuclear Proliferation, and Interstate Disputes

    Open Access•Erik Gartzke, Dong-Joon Jo•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2009

  • Goliath's Curse

    Open Access•Todd S Sechser•International Organization•2010

  • Nuclear Superiority and the Balance of Resolve

    Open Access•Matthew Kroenig•International Organization•2013

Unique citing works6
Citations per year6
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae