How Strong Is the Nuclear Taboo Today
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11271246 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nina Tannenwald (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 89-109 |
| Publication date | 2018-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Washington Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-660X • E-ISSN: 1530-9177 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163660x.2018.1520553 |
| OpenAlex | W2892437853 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
Since August 1945, when the United States dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan in the closing days of WWII, no nation has employed nuclear weapons during war. Many people at the time fully expected t
Political science · Taboo · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Rhetoric and Communication Studies
North Korea and the Global Nuclear Order
Proliferating Bias? American Political Science, Nuclear Weapons, and Global Security
Forum
Hawks in the making? European public views on nuclear weapons post‐Ukraine
Buck-passing, Chain-ganging and Alliances in the Multipolar Indo-Asia-Pacific
Anarchy, Technology, and the Self-Destruction Hypothesis
Social desirability bias and public opinion on nuclear weaponization
Jesting with a Double-Edge Sword
External Threats and Public Opinion
Everyday nuclear histories and futures in the Middle East, 1945–1948
The lesser evil? Experimental evidence on the strength of nuclear and chemical weapon “taboos”
Russia’s Failed Nuclear Coercion Against Ukraine
The Two Faces of Opposition to Chemical Weapons
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,86 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |