Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Linguistic or Pictorial Context

Does It Make a Difference

Bibliographic Data

ID11273131
AuthorsVered Heruti (Beit Berl College, corresponding author), Dafna Bergerbest (School of Behavioral Sciences, The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Israel), Rachel Giora (0000-0001-9628-9088, Tel Aviv University)
Year2019
Volume56
Issue8
Pages748-763
Publication date2019-11-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse Processes (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0163-853X • E-ISSN: 1532-6950
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0163853x.2019.1565277
OpenAlexW2913384724
LanguageEN
References cited38

In two experiments this study tested the Graded Salience Hypothesis and the Defaultness Hypothesis. It weighs the effects of linguistic versus pictorial contexts in terms of activation (or suppression) of default, salient meanings when context invites nondefault, less-salient alternatives. Using a naming task, Experiments 1 and 2 looked into the processing speed of ambiguous probe words, following a linguistic or pictorial prime, supportive of the less-salient, nondefault meaning. Prime presentation was either limited to 350 ms (Experiment 1) or self-paced (Experiment 2). Findings support the Graded Salience Hypothesis and the Defaultness Hypothesis, showing that, as predicted, default meanings were activated initially even when context, whether linguistic or pictorial, was strongly biased toward the alternative, nondefault meaning. These novel findings suggest that linguistic and pictorial contexts affect linguistic disambiguation to the same extent

Affect (linguistics · Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology · Context effect · Linguistic analysis · Linguistic context · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Prime (order theory · Salience (neuroscience · Salient · Word (group theory · Communication · Computer Science · History · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Mathematics · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Artificial Intelligence

  • On Our MindSalience, Context, and Figurative Language

    Rachel Giora•On Our Mind•2003

  • Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading

    Open Access•Susan A Duffy, Robin K Morris et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•1988

  • The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access.

    Antony Cutler, Anne Cutler et al.•Journal of Experimental…•1988

  • Lexical access during sentence comprehension

    Open Access•David Swinney, David A Swinney•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1979

  • The Modularity of Mind

    Jerry A Fodor•Modularity of Mind•1983

  • Negation Generates Nonliteral Interpretations by Default

    Rachel Giora, Elad Livnat et al.•Metaphor and Symbol•2013

  • Defaultness Reigns

    Rachel Giora, Shir Givoni et al.•Metaphor and Symbol•2015

  • Salience and Context Effects

    Orna Peleg, Rachel Giora et al.•Metaphor and Symbol•2001

  • On the priority of salience-based interpretations

    Ofer Fein, Menahem Yeari et al.•Intercultural Pragmatics•2015

  • Understanding figurative and literal language

    Open Access•Rachel Giora•Cognitive Linguistics•1997

  • Negation in Context

    Rachel Giora, Ofer Fein et al.•Discourse Processes•2007

  • When we say no we mean no

    Open Access•Rachel Giora, Vered Heruti et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2009

  • On the priority of salient meanings

    Open Access•Rachel Giora•Journal of Pragmatics•1999

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae