Effects of Contrast on Referential Form

Investigating the Distinction Between Strong and Weak Pronouns

Bibliographic Data

ID11273167
AuthorsElke Kaiser (0000-0003-3594-4127, University of Southern California, corresponding author), Elsi Kaiser
Year2010
Volume47
Issue6
Pages480-509
Publication date2010-08-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse Processes (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0163-853X • E-ISSN: 1532-6950
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01638530903347643
OpenAlexW2094573197
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited34

To further our understanding of the nature of the form–function mapping in anaphoric paradigms, this study investigated the referential properties of strong pronouns (long pronouns) in Estonian. Cross-linguistically, 2 main accounts of the long–short distinction have been proposed: the salience account (long pronouns refer to less salient antecedents) and the contrast account (long pronouns refer to entities that are being mentioned contrastively). To test these claims, this study compared parallel corpora of Estonian and Finnish to see how Estonian long pronouns are realized in Finnish and what the grammatical role of the antecedent is. Building on Pajusalu (1997) Pajusalu, R. 1997. Eesti pronoomeneid I. Ühiskeele see, tootema/ta [Estonian pronouns I. Seetootema/ta in common Estonian]. Keel ja Kirjandus, 1: 24–30. 2, 106–115 [Google Scholar], this study also analyzed the referential properties of long pronouns from the perspective of alternative semantics (Rooth, 1992 Rooth, M. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1: 75–116. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) and Jackendoff's (1972) Jackendoff, R. S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.. [Google Scholar] and Büring's (2003) Büring, D. 2003. On D-trees, beans and B-accents. Linguistics & Philosophy, 26: 511–545. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar] research on contrast. The corpus patterns support the contrast account, indicating that the long–short distinction cannot be straightforwardly reduced to referent salience. As a whole, these results fit with the form-specific multiple-constraints approach to reference resolution (Kaiser & Trueswell, 2008 Kaiser, E. and Trueswell, J. C. 2008. Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23: 709–748. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar])

Contrast (vision · Estonian · Focus (optics · Grammar · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Pronoun · Referent · Salience (neuroscience · Subject pronoun · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub