Learning From Refutation and Standard Expository Science Texts
The Contribution of Inhibitory Functions in Relation to Text Type
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11273249 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lucia Mason (0000-0001-7134-0510, University of Padua, autor de correspondencia), Erika Borella (0000-0001-5481-6601, University of Padua), Irene‐anna Diakidoy (0000-0003-3650-8108, University of Cyprus), Irene-Anna N Diakidoy (University of Cyprus), Reese Butterfu (0000-0001-9326-4176, Minnesota Department of Education), Reese Butterfuss (University of Minnesota), Panayiota Kendeou (0000-0002-0392-7659, University of Minnesota), Barbara Carretti (0000-0001-5147-7544, University of Padua) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 57 |
| Número | 10 |
| Páginas | 921-939 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-11-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Discourse Processes (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0163-853X • E-ISSN: 1532-6950 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853x.2020.1826248 |
| OpenAlex | W3106279467 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 59 |
Inhibition is thought to help suppress interference from misconceptions in science learning. Using a pre-, post-, and delayed posttest design, we examined the influence on learning from science texts of three inhibitory-related functions—prepotent response inhibition, resistance to distractor interference, and resistance to proactive interference. Children in the fourth and fifth grades (N = 110) read two texts, one about energy and one about the food chain. One of the texts was a standard expository text; the other was a refutation text. We found that, regardless of text type, students’ conceptual knowledge increased between pretest and posttest, a result retained at delayed posttest. Prepotent response inhibition uniquely predicted conceptual learning but only from refutation texts at both posttests after controlling for prior knowledge and reading comprehension skills. Inhibiting proactive interference also contributed to long-term conceptual learning but only in refutation text readers. These findings suggest that specific inhibitory functions play a role in learning from science texts depending on text structure
Cognitive psychology · Comprehension · Conceptual change · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Reading (process · Reading comprehension · Relation (database · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Philosophy · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Science Education and Pedagogy
Differential Competencies Contributing to Children's Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Texts
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
An Item Analysis Which Takes Individual Differences Into Account
Refutation Text in Science Education
The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts
The Relations Among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions
Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties
Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions
Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures across development
The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension
Reducing interference from misconceptions
Learning from texts
Knowledge Revision Processes in Refutation Texts
Augmenting the Refutation Text Effect with Analogies and Graphics
Roles of Attention Shifting and Inhibitory Control in Fourth-Grade Reading Comprehension
Bridging Reading Comprehension and Conceptual Change in Science Education
Comprehension and Learning From Refutation and Expository Texts
Assessment matters
The Instrumental Value of Explanations
On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |