Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests∗
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11273706 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Raymond W Gibbs (0000-0003-2038-223X, University of California San Diego, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-10 |
| Publication date | 1979-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discourse Processes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-853X • E-ISSN: 1532-6950 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01638537909544450 |
| OpenAlex | W2058081143 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 78 |
| References cited | 4 |
Subjects were presented with sentences like "Must you open the window?" either embedded within a story context or as an isolated sentence. Within the story context, the sentence could have its literal meaning, "Is it necessary that you open the window?" or its indirect or conveyed meaning, "Do not open the window." Subjects gave comprehension responses and paraphrase judgments for the sentences. In a story context subjects take longer to understand literal sentences than conveyed ones. Without context the conveyed requests take longer than the literal sentences. A second experiment found that in a story context subjects take as long to understand a direct request, "Do not open the window," as to verify an indirect request, "Must you open the window." The data from these experiments suggest that a person understanding an indirect request in context need not construct the literal interpretation before deriving the conveyed request. Notes This research was supported by National Institute of Education Grant G‐77–0015 to David E. Rumelhart and Public Health Service Grant MH 15828–09 to the Center for Human Information Processing. I wish to thank David Rumelhart and the entire LNR Research Group for their support and guidance in all phases of this work. Additional thanks to Robert Olds for his assistance in running the experiment and to Robert Glushko, Jeff Miller, James McClelland, Donald Norman, and Arthur Samuel for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Reprint requests may be sent to Raymond W. Gibbs, Department of Psychology C‐009, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
Cognitive psychology · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Speech and dialogue systems
Familiaridade ou convencionalidade? Investigando fatores relevantes no processamento de metáforas
Um estudo experimental do processamento de metáforas do português brasileiro / An experimental study on Brazilian Portuguese metaphor processing
Antecedent-Contained Deletion
Negation
Vagueness
Politeness
Metonymy
Word Senses
Scalar Implicatures
Counterfactuals
Exhaustivity in It -Clefts
Constraint-Based Pragmatic Processing
Theory of Mind
Language Comprehension, Inference, and Alternatives
Plurality
Genericity
Focus
Pronouns
Verbal Uncertainty
Quantifier Spreading
Presuppositions, Projection, and Accommodation
Reference and Informativeness
Modified Numerals
Distributivity
Adjective Meaning and Scales
Negative Polarity Items
Event (De)composition
Spatial Terms
Ironic Utterances
Metaphor
Turn-Taking
Quantification
Prosody and Meaning
Experimental Pragmatics
Polite responses to polite requests
Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation
On understanding nonliteral speech
The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics
Request complexity is no more a problem when the requests are ironic
The Symmetry Control in Tests of the Standard Pragmatic Model
Children's understanding of indirect requests
The Process of Language Understanding
The relation of language to context in children’s speech the role of Hafta statements in structuring 3-year-old’s discourse
How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem 'Special'
Muting the Meaning A Social Function of Irony
Beyond the Lexicon
What Could Reaction-Time Studies Be Telling Us About Metaphor Comprehension
On the priority of salience-based interpretations
Comprehending non-canonical and indirect speech acts in German
Validity Assessments of Compliance Gaining Exemplars
Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory
Strategy and structure in conversational influence attempts
The effects of direct and indirect speech acts on native English and ESL speakers’ perception of teacher written feedback
Interpreting Questions and Replies
Misunderstandings and explicit/implicit communication
Pragmatic factors in making and understanding promises
Skating on thin ice
Inferring the interpretation of attributive and referential definite descriptions
Individual Differences in Mentalizing Capacity Predict Indirect Request Comprehension
Getting the Hang of American Slang
The Role of Prosody in Disambiguating English Indirect Requests
Processing of metaphoric language
On the process of understanding idioms
Proverb Comprehension
Comprehension and the interpretation of proverbs
A Transparência Ilocucionária E a Marcação Pragmática Sob Perspectiva Interlingüística
Experimental pragmatics/semantics
The empirical study of figurative language in literature
Pragmatic Comprehension in Learner-native Speaker Discourse
Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony
A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated
"Can you read my mind?" Conventionalized indirect requests and Theory of Mind abilities
Responding indirectly
Indirectness and politeness in requests
Indirect requests, relevance, and politeness
Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference
Indirect request processing, sentence types and illocutionary forces
Acquiring Assistance from Others The Effect of Indirect Requests and Relational Intimacy on Verbal Compliance
| Unique citing works | 78 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,7 |
| Citation span | 1980 - 2023 (44) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 76 |