Condorcet domains on at most seven alternatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11284307 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dolica Akello-Egwel (0009-0007-0096-3666), Charles Leedham-Green, C R Leedham-Green, Alastair Litterick (0000-0002-1355-258X), Klas Markström (0000-0002-6344-1642), Søren Rii (0000-0003-0697-4116), Søren Riis (0000-0002-3984-1638) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 133 |
| Pages | 23-33 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Mathematical Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0165-4896 • E-ISSN: 1879-3118 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2024.12.002 |
| OpenAlex | W4405365743 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 32 |
A Condorcet domain is a collection of linear orders which avoid Condorcet's paradox for majority voting. We have developed a new algorithm for complete enumeration of all maximal Condorcet domains and, using a supercomputer, obtained the first enumeration of all maximal Condorcet domains on n≤7 alternatives. We investigate properties of these domains and use this study to resolve several open questions regarding Condorcet domains, and propose several new conjectures. Following this we connect our results to other domain types used in voting theory, such a non-dictatorial and strategy-proof domains. All our data are made freely available on the web
Condorcet method · Econometrics · Economics · Mathematical economics · Political science · Voting · Computer Science · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Mathematics · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions
Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions
Manipulation of Voting Schemes
Social Choice and Individual Values
The largest Condorcet domain on 8 alternatives
The structure of non-manipulable social choice rules on a tree
Single-peaked orders on a tree
On strategy-proofness and single peakedness
On the Rationale of Group Decision-making
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |