Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions

Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions

Bibliographic Data

ID23355151
AuthorsMark Allen Satterthwaite
Year1975
Volume10
Issue2
Pages187-217
Publication date1975-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Economic Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0531 • E-ISSN: 1095-7235
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2
OpenAlexW2129678216
LanguageEN
Citations received319
References cited11

Anti-plurality voting · Approval voting · Arrow · Arrow's impossibility theorem · Ballot · Cardinal voting systems · Condorcet method · Economics · Independence (probability theory) · Independence of irrelevant alternatives · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Political science · Preference · Rationality · Set (abstract data type) · Social choice theory · Statistics · Voting · Welfare · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Computer Science · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Mathematics

  • Social Choice and Legitimacy

    Open Access•John W Patty, Elizabeth Maggie Penn•Social Choice and Legitimacy•2014

  • Democratic Deliberation and Social Choice

    Christian List•Oxford Handbook of Deliberative…•2018

  • Risk-limiting Audits and the Margin of Victory in Nonplurality Elections

    Anand D Sarwate, Stephen Checkoway et al.•Statistics Politics and Policy•2013

  • Voters’ Rationality Under Four Electoral Rules

    Open Access•Julián Parada, Miguel Bazdresch Parada•Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad•2011

  • Consensus, Negotiation and Mediation

    Keith Lehrer•Consensus Under Fuzziness•1997

  • Strategic Voting in Plurality Elections

    Open Access•James W Endersby, Kelly B Shaw•PS Political Science & Politics•2009

  • Contingent valuation

    Open Access•Felix Schläpfer•Ecological Economics•2009

  • Formal Models of Legislative Processes

    Open Access•William H Panning•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1983

  • Geometry of anonymous binary social choices that are strategy-proof

    Open Access•Achille Basile, Surekha Rao et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2022

  • Project selection with partially verifiable information

    Open Access•Sumit Goel, Wade Hann-Caruthers•Mathematical Social Sciences•2024

  • Agenda Control, Organizational Structure, and Bureaucratic Politics

    Thomas H Hammond•American Journal of Political…•1986

  • Noncooperative Counter-threats to Vote Trading

    James M Enelow•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Electoral Equilibrium under Alternative Voting Institutions

    Gary W Cox•American Journal of Political…•1987

  • Graph-Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting

    Nicholas R Miller•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • A Comparison of Efficiency of Multicandidate Electoral Systems

    Samuel Merrill•American Journal of Political…•1984

  • All voting is strategic

    Open Access•James M Buchanan, Yong J Yoon•Public Choice•2006

  • The Role of Leaders in Democratic Deliberations

    Open Access•Michael Humphreys, Macartan Humphreys et al.•World Politics•2006

  • Analyses géométriques et probabilistes des règles de vote, avec une application au scrutin majoritaire à deux tours

    Vincent Merlin, Dominique Lepelley•Revue économique•1999

  • Information imparfaite et économie publique

    Jean-Jacques Laffont, Jean‐jacques Laffont•Revue économique•1982

  • Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice

    Open Access•David Miller•Political Studies•1992

  • Ships That Pass in the Night

    Open Access•Ian Mclean, Iain Mclean•The Political Quarterly•1988

  • Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible

    Ronald G Cummings, S R Elliott et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1997

  • Policy Uncertainty in Two-Level Games

    Michael D Mcginnis, John T Williams•International Studies Quarterly•1993

  • Decision Theory

    Peter C Fishburn•The Economic Journal•1991

  • Personal Utilities and Public Judgements

    Amartya Sen•The Economic Journal•1979

  • Voids or Fragmentation

    Open Access•Matthew Braham, Martin Van Hees•The Economic Journal•2018

  • Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•John S Dryzek, Christian List•British Journal of Political…•2003

  • An empirical study of some election systems

    Clyde H Coombs, Jerry L Cohen et al.•American Psychologist•1984

  • Social Choice and Public Reason

    Cyril Hédoin•Social Choice and Public Reason•2026

  • Locally robust implementation and its limits

    Open Access•Philippe Jehiel, Moritz Meyer-ter-Vehn et al.•Journal of Economic Theory•2012

  • Cycles and Social Choice

    Thomas Schwartz•Cycles and Social Choice•2018

  • The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behaviorand Public Opinion

    SJ Ward, RK Gibson et al.•Routledge Handbook of Elections,…•2017

  • Opinion Diffusion and Analysis on Social Networks

    Open Access•Cheng-Te Li, Cheng–Te Li et al.•Encyclopedia of Social Network…•2014

  • Welfare Economics

    Open Access•Yew-Kwang Ng, Yew‐kwang Ng•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Public Choice Theory

    Open Access•Dennis C Mueller•Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2017

  • Bergson-Wohlfahrtsfunktion und normative Ökonomie

    Thorsten Giersch•Bergson-Wohlfahrtsfunktion und…•1993

  • Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice

    Open Access•Michael A Neblo•Deliberative Democracy Between…•2015

  • The Economic Vote

    Open Access•Raymond M Duch, Raymond Duch et al.•Economic Vote•2008

  • Designing Federalism

    Open Access•Mikhail Filippov, Михаил Филиппов et al.•Designing Federalism•2004

  • Social Choice Theory

    Amartya Sen•Econometrica•1977

  • Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem

    Roger B Myerson, Roger Myerson•Econometrica•1979

  • Strategic Voting Under Proportional Representation

    Gary W Cox, Matthew Soberg Shugart•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1996

  • Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality

    Eric Maskin•The Review of Economic Studies•1999

  • The Possibility of Social Choice

    Amartya Sen•American Economic Review•1999

  • Chapter 17 Contingent Valuation

    Richard T Carson, W Michael Hanemann•Handbook of Environmental Economics•2005

  • What's to Know About Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation Studies?

    Open Access•John B Loomis, John Loomis•Journal of Economic Surveys•2011

  • Contingent Valuation

    Open Access•Richard T Carson, Nicholas E Flores et al.•Environmental and Resource…•2001

  • A multistage game representation of sophisticated voting for binary procedures

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Richard G Niemi•Journal of Economic Theory•1978

  • Incentive and informational properties of preference questions

    Open Access•Richard T Carson, Theodore Groves•Environmental and Resource…•2007

  • Lost in Translation

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia, Mathew D Mccubbins•SSRN Electronic Journal•2004

  • Formal political theory

    Open Access•Norman Schofield•Quality & Quantity•1980

  • Naturalism and Moral Conventionalism

    Cyril Hédoin•Social Choice and Public Reason•2026

  • Public Reason's Chaos Theorem

    Open Access•Brian Kogelmann•EPISTÉMÈ•2019

  • Democracy Defended

    Open Access•Gerry Mackie•Democracy Defended•2003

  • Separable Preferences, Strategyproofness, and Decomposability

    Open Access•Michel Le Breton, Arunava Sen•Econometrica•1999

  • Gerrymander-proof representative democracies

    Open Access•Sebastian Bervoets, Vincent Merlin•International Journal of Game…•2011

  • Strategy-Proof Judgment Aggregation

    Open Access•Franz Dietrich, Christian List•Economics and Philosophy•2007

  • Implementación en la asignación de proyectos con las regalías en Colombia

    Open Access•Daniel Blandón Restrepo•Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad•2017

  • Ethics of Strategic Voting in Popular Elections

    Open Access•Łukasz Łyżwa•Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i…•2022

  • The marginalist Marxism of Tugan-Baranovsky

    Open Access•Chad Satterlee•European Journal of the History…•2026

  • Does Incomplete Information Reduce Manipulability

    Open Access•Yuliya A Veselova•Group Decision and Negotiation•2020

  • Performance Evaluation

    Open Access•António Osório•Group Decision and Negotiation•2020

  • Formation of Parties and Coalitions in Multiple Referendums

    Open Access•Meir Kalech, Moshe Koppel et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2020

  • Normed Negative Voting to Depolarize Politics

    Open Access•Karthik H Shankar•Group Decision and Negotiation•2022

  • Specific Tastes or Cliques of Jurors? How to Reduce the Level of Manipulation in Group Decisions

    Open Access•Krzysztof Kontek, Honorata Sosnowska•Group Decision and Negotiation•2020

  • Queen Elisabeth competition

    Open Access•Sébastien Courtin, Marin Gohard et al.•Journal of Cultural Economics•2026

  • Identifying outlier scores and outlier jurors to reduce manipulation in classical music competitions

    Open Access•Krzysztof Kontek, Kevin Kenner•Journal of Cultural Economics•2025

  • Eliminating Group Agency

    Open Access•Lars J K Moen•Economics and Philosophy•2023

  • Isolationism, instrumentalism and fiscal policy

    Open Access•Bruno Verbeek•Economics and Philosophy•2025

  • The probability of violating Arrow’s conditions

    Open Access•Keith L Dougherty, Jac C Heckelman•European Journal of Political…•2020

  • Priority domains

    Open Access•Arunava Sen, Ankit Singh•Social Choice and Welfare•2026

  • Where should your daughter go to college? An axiomatic analysis

    Open Access•William Thomson•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • Characterization of tie-breaking plurality rules

    Open Access•Hiroki Saitoh•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • Collective choice rules on restricted domains based on a priori information

    Open Access•Shashwat Khare, Ton Storcken•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • On the safety of group manipulation

    Open Access•Hans Peters, Yuliya Veselova et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • Stable preference aggregation with infinite population

    Open Access•Susumu Cato•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • Cycles in synchronous iterative voting

    Open Access•Benoît Kloeckner•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • Plurality rule and Condorcet criterion over restricted domains

    Open Access•Thérèse Embigne Killanga, Issofa Moyouwou et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2025

  • Semi-flexible majority rules for public good provision

    Open Access•Hans Gersbach, Oriol Tejada•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • Stochastic same-sidedness in the random voting model

    Open Access•Sarvesh Bandhu, Abhinaba Lahiri et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • A modified version of Arrow’s IIA condition

    Open Access•Eric Maskin•Social Choice and Welfare•2020

  • Robust incentive compatibility of voting rules with positively correlated beliefs

    Open Access•Dipjyoti Majumdar, Arunava Sen•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • Strategyproof randomized social choice for restricted sets of utility functions

    Open Access•Patrick Lederer•Social Choice and Welfare•2026

  • Unanimity and local incentive compatibility in sparsely connected domains

    Open Access•Miho Hong, Semin Kim•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • Freedom and voting power

    Open Access•Itai Sher•Social Choice and Welfare•2025

  • Taxonomy of powerful voters and manipulation in the framework of social choice functions

    Open Access•Amílcar Mata Díaz, Ramón Pino Pérez et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • Arbiter assignment

    Open Access•Mustafa Oǧuz Afacan, Nejat Anbarci et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2026

  • Do grades have absolute meaning? An experiment on majority judgment

    Open Access•Théo Delemazure, Roberto Brunetti et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2026

  • Relaxed notions of Condorcet-consistency and efficiency for strategyproof social decision schemes

    Open Access•Felix Brandt, Patrick Lederer et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • Honesty and epistemological implementation of social choice functions with asymmetric information

    Open Access•Hitoshi Matsushima•Social Choice and Welfare•2025

  • Undominated rules with three alternatives in an almost unrestricted domain

    Open Access•Dolors Berga, Bernardo Moreno et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • A combinatorial topology approach to Arrow’s impossibility theorem

    Open Access•Sergio Rajsbaum, Armajac Raventós-Pujol•Social Choice and Welfare•2026

  • Proxy selection in transitive proxy voting

    Open Access•Jacqueline Harding•Social Choice and Welfare•2022

  • Balanced VCG mechanisms for sequencing problems

    Open Access•Youngsub Chun, MANIPUSHPAK MITRA et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • Optimality of the coordinate-wise median mechanism for strategyproof facility location in two dimensions

    Open Access•Sumit Goel, Wade Hann-Caruthers•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • Recovering non-monotonicity problems of voting rules

    Open Access•Umut Keskin, M Remzi Sanver et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • A general impossibility theorem on Pareto efficiency and Bayesian incentive compatibility

    Open Access•Kazuya Kikuchi, Yukio Koriyama•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • The framing of elections

    Open Access•Carlos Alós-Ferrer, Michele Garagnani et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2025

  • An axiomatic characterization of the Slater rule

    Open Access•Burak Can, Mohsen Pourpouneh et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • Group strategy-proof rules in multidimensional binary domains

    Open Access•Aditya Aradhye, Hans Peters•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • Manipulation of Voting Schemes

    Allan Gibbard•Econometrica•1973

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    Kenneth J Arrow, Eric S Maskin•Social Choice and Individual Values•2017

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal

    Amartya Sen•Journal of Political Economy•1970

  • Voting Systems, Honest Preferences and Pareto Optimality

    Open Access•Richard Zeckhauser•American Political Science Review•1973

Unique citing works319
Citations per year6,38
Citation span1976 - 2026 (51)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 290

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae