Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Condorcet criterion and committee selection

Bibliographic Data

ID11284669
AuthorsWilliam V Gehrlein (0000-0001-5974-8791, University of Delaware, corresponding author)
Year1985
Volume10
Issue3
Pages199-209
Publication date1985-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMathematical Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0165-4896 • E-ISSN: 1879-3118
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/0165-4896(85)90043-5
OpenAlexW1976060283
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited12

Approval voting · Condorcet method · Epistemology · Mathematical economics · Political science · Selection (genetic algorithm · Simple (philosophy · Voting · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Mathematics · Artificial Intelligence

  • Combining Diversity and Excellence in Multiwinner Elections

    Open Access•Mostapha Di, Clinton Gubong Gassi et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2025

  • Monotonicity anomalies in Scottish local government elections

    Open Access•David Mccune, Adam Graham-Squire•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • Social acceptability and the majoritarian compromise rule

    Open Access•Mostapha Di, Clinton Gubong Gassi et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting

    Open Access•Jean‐françois Laslier, Karine Van Der Straeten•Social Choice and Welfare•2016

  • Simulations in Models of Preference Aggregation

    Open Access•Mostapha Di, Eric Kamwa•OEconomia•2020

  • Social acceptability of Condorcet committees

    Open Access•Mostapha Di, Muhammad Mahajne•Mathematical Social Sciences•2020

  • Multi-winner rules analogous to the Plurality rule

    Open Access•Clinton Gubong Gassi, Frank Steffen•Mathematical Social Sciences•2025

  • A social choice approach to ordinal group activity selection

    Open Access•Andreas Darmann•Mathematical Social Sciences•2018

  • Extensions of the Young and Levenglick result about the inconsistency of Condorcet voting correspondences

    Open Access•José Luis Jimeno, Estefanía García et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2011

  • Which set of agents plays a key role? An impossibility in transforming binary relations

    Open Access•Takahiro Suzuki, Masahide Horita•Mathematical Social Sciences•2024

  • How hard is it to tell which is a Condorcet committee

    Open Access•Andreas Darmann•Mathematical Social Sciences•2013

  • Frequency of paradox in a common n-winner voting scheme

    Open Access•Douglas W Mitchell, William N Trumbull•Public Choice•1992

  • Multi-winner scoring election methods

    Open Access•Mostapha Di, Ahmed Doghmi•Public Choice•2016

  • Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting

    Open Access•Daniela Bubboloni, Mostapha Di et al.•Public Choice•2020

  • Weak Condorcet winner(s) revisited

    Open Access•Dan S Felsenthal, Nicolaus Tideman•Public Choice•2014

  • Selecting Committees

    Open Access•Thomas Ratliff, Thomas C Ratliff•Public Choice•2006

  • Computer Simulation Techniques

    M J Garside, Th H Naylor et al.•Economica•1967

  • Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•Social Science Research•1978

Unique citing works16
Citations per year0.47
Citation span1992 - 2025 (34)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae