Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

William V Gehrlein

Biographic Data

ID4268845
NAMEWilliam V Gehrlein
GIVEN NAMESWilliam V
FAMILY NAMEGehrlein
SIGNATUREGEHRLEIN W V
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Delaware
ORCID0000-0001-5974-8791
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS23
TOTAL CITATIONS96
AUTHOR COUNT23
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1975
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX6
  • Peter C. Fishburn (1936–2021)

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, William V Gehrlein et al.•ARTICLE•Theory and Decision•2022

  • Peter C. Fishburn (1936–2021)

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, William V Gehrlein et al.•ARTICLE•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • Peter C. Fishburn (1936–2021)

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, William V Gehrlein et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2021

  • A note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 14

  • The impact of voters’ preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Issofa Moyouwou et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2013•Cited by: 3•References: 17

  • The effectiveness of weighted scoring rules when pairwise majority rule cycles exist

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2004•References: 14

  • On Some Limitations of the Median Voting Rule

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Cited by: 2•References: 18

  • The Condorcet efficiency of Borda Rule with anonymous voters

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2001•Cited by: 8•References: 8

  • Condorcet Efficiency of Borda Rule under the Dual Culture Condition

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1999•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • The expected likelihood of transitivity for probabilistic choosers with single-peaked preferences

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1993•References: 18

  • Probability calculations for transitivity of simple majority rule with anonymous voters

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 2•References: 12

  • The probability of intransitivity of pairwise comparisons in individual preference

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1989•Cited by: 3•References: 8

  • The impact of social homogeneity on the Condorcet efficiency of weighted scoring rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 13

  • The Condorcet criterion and committee selection

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1985•Cited by: 11•References: 11

  • Scoring rule sensitivity to weight selection

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1983•References: 8

  • Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1982•Cited by: 11•References: 10

  • Scoring rule and majority agreements for large electorates with arbitrary preferences

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1982•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • Social homogeneity and Condorcet's paradox

    Open Access•Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1980•Cited by: 6•References: 13

  • The effects of abstentions on election outcomes

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1978•References: 13

  • Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1978•Cited by: 7•References: 22

  • Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1976•Cited by: 26•References: 22

  • Borda's rule, positional voting, and Condorcet's simple majority principle

    Open Access•Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1976•Cited by: 9•References: 7

  • A comparative analysis of methods for constructing weak orders from partial orders

    Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1975•Cited by: 1

    This paper compares three methods (sequel, cardinal, maximal) for constructing a weak order from a partial order on a finite set. The constructed weak orders include the partial order. To evaluate the methods, several different selection disciplines were used to stochastically generate partial orders from a fixed linear order. The error of a weak order which includes a generated partial order is a function of the number of ordered pairs added to …

  • Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1976•Cited by: 26•References: 22

  • The Condorcet criterion and committee selection

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1985•Cited by: 11•References: 11

  • Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1982•Cited by: 11•References: 10

  • Borda's rule, positional voting, and Condorcet's simple majority principle

    Open Access•Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1976•Cited by: 9•References: 7

  • The Condorcet efficiency of Borda Rule with anonymous voters

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2001•Cited by: 8•References: 8

  • Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1978•Cited by: 7•References: 22

  • Social homogeneity and Condorcet's paradox

    Open Access•Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1980•Cited by: 6•References: 13

  • A note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 14

  • The impact of voters’ preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Issofa Moyouwou et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2013•Cited by: 3•References: 17

  • The probability of intransitivity of pairwise comparisons in individual preference

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1989•Cited by: 3•References: 8

  • On Some Limitations of the Median Voting Rule

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Cited by: 2•References: 18

  • Probability calculations for transitivity of simple majority rule with anonymous voters

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 2•References: 12

  • Scoring rule and majority agreements for large electorates with arbitrary preferences

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1982•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • Condorcet Efficiency of Borda Rule under the Dual Culture Condition

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1999•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • The impact of social homogeneity on the Condorcet efficiency of weighted scoring rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 13

  • A comparative analysis of methods for constructing weak orders from partial orders

    Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1975•Cited by: 1

    This paper compares three methods (sequel, cardinal, maximal) for constructing a weak order from a partial order on a finite set. The constructed weak orders include the partial order. To evaluate the methods, several different selection disciplines were used to stochastically generate partial orders from a fixed linear order. The error of a weak order which includes a generated partial order is a function of the number of ordered pairs added to …

  • A comparative analysis of methods for constructing weak orders from partial orders

    Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1975•Cited by: 1

    This paper compares three methods (sequel, cardinal, maximal) for constructing a weak order from a partial order on a finite set. The constructed weak orders include the partial order. To evaluate the methods, several different selection disciplines were used to stochastically generate partial orders from a fixed linear order. The error of a weak order which includes a generated partial order is a function of the number of ordered pairs added to …

  • Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1976•Cited by: 26•References: 22

  • Borda's rule, positional voting, and Condorcet's simple majority principle

    Open Access•Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1976•Cited by: 9•References: 7

  • The effects of abstentions on election outcomes

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1978•References: 13

  • Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1978•Cited by: 7•References: 22

  • Social homogeneity and Condorcet's paradox

    Open Access•Peter C Fishburn, William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1980•Cited by: 6•References: 13

  • Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1982•Cited by: 11•References: 10

  • Scoring rule and majority agreements for large electorates with arbitrary preferences

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1982•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • Scoring rule sensitivity to weight selection

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Peter C Fishburn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1983•References: 8

  • The Condorcet criterion and committee selection

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1985•Cited by: 11•References: 11

  • The impact of social homogeneity on the Condorcet efficiency of weighted scoring rules

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 13

  • The probability of intransitivity of pairwise comparisons in individual preference

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1989•Cited by: 3•References: 8

  • Probability calculations for transitivity of simple majority rule with anonymous voters

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 2•References: 12

  • The expected likelihood of transitivity for probabilistic choosers with single-peaked preferences

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1993•References: 18

  • Condorcet Efficiency of Borda Rule under the Dual Culture Condition

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•1999•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • The Condorcet efficiency of Borda Rule with anonymous voters

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2001•Cited by: 8•References: 8

  • On Some Limitations of the Median Voting Rule

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Cited by: 2•References: 18

  • The effectiveness of weighted scoring rules when pairwise majority rule cycles exist

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2004•References: 14

  • The impact of voters’ preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Issofa Moyouwou et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2013•Cited by: 3•References: 17

  • A note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser

    Open Access•William V Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 14

  • Peter C. Fishburn (1936–2021)

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, William V Gehrlein et al.•ARTICLE•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • Peter C. Fishburn (1936–2021)

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, William V Gehrlein et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2021

  • Peter C. Fishburn (1936–2021)

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, William V Gehrlein et al.•ARTICLE•Theory and Decision•2022

Mathematics (18 works) · Computer Science (17 works) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (17 works) · Mathematical economics (15 works) · Law (14 works) · Political science (14 works) · Voting (14 works) · Condorcet method (13 works) · Statistics (12 works) · Law (11 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae