Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

L.S. Penrose's limit theorem

Proof of some special cases

Bibliographic Data

ID11285488
AuthorsInes Lindner (0000-0003-4072-3820, Universität Hamburg), Moshé Machover (corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume47
Issue1
Pages37-49
Publication date2004-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMathematical Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0165-4896 • E-ISSN: 1879-3118
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/s0165-4896(03)00069-6
OpenAlexW2140454325
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited7

Combinatorics · Conjecture · Discrete mathematics · Limit (mathematics · Mathematical analysis · Mathematical economics · Mathematical proof · Measure (data warehouse · Political science · Power index · Simple (philosophy · Voting · Weighted voting · Auction Theory and Applications · Computer Science · Game Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy

  • An Appropriate Way to Extend the Banzhaf Index for Multiple Levels of Approval

    Open Access•Josep Freixas, Montserrat Pons•Group Decision and Negotiation•2021

  • Welfare ordering of voting weight allocations

    Open Access•Kazuya Kikuchi•Social Choice and Welfare•2023

  • Le mécanisme optimal de vote au sein du conseil des représentants d’un système fédéral

    Michel Le Breton, Dominique Lepelley et al.•L Actualité économique•2017

  • Une analyse de la loi électorale du 29 juin 1820

    Michel Le Breton, Dominique Lepelley•Revue économique•2014

  • Invariably Suboptimal

    Open Access•Werner Kirsch, Jessica Langner•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2011

  • L S Penrose's limit theorem

    Open Access•Pao-Li Chang, Pao‐Li Chang et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2006

  • On influence and compromise in two-tier voting systems

    Open Access•Geoffrey Grimmett, Geoffrey R Grimmett•Mathematical Social Sciences•2019

  • Average weights and power in weighted voting games

    Open Access•Daria Boratyn, Werner Kirsch et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2020

  • Why not proportional

    Open Access•Jean-François Laslier, Jean‐françois Laslier•Mathematical Social Sciences•2012

  • Cases where the Penrose limit theorem does not hold

    Open Access•Ines Lindner, Guillermo Owens et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2007

  • Testing Penrose Limit Theorem

    Open Access•Zineb Abidi Perier, Vincent Merlin•Mathematical Social Sciences•2025

  • Power indices in large voting bodies

    Open Access•Dennis Leech•Public Choice•2013

  • Thinking About the Political Impacts of the Electoral College

    Open Access•B Grofman, L Feld et al.•Public Choice•2005

  • What to Do About Election Inversions Under Proportional Representation

    Dan S Felsenthal, Nicholas R Miller•Representation•2015

  • The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting

    L S Penrose•Journal Of The Royal Statistical…•1946

  • On the Objective Study of Crowd Behaviour

    Lancelot Hogben•Journal of Epidemiology and…•1952

  • On the Objective Study of Crowd Behaviour

    Open Access•J S, L S Penrose•Population•1953

Unique citing works14
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2005 - 2025 (21)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae