Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Non-cohabiting Partners’ Economic Characteristics and the Transition to Living Together in Germany

A Couple-Level Perspective

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11294920
AutoresValeria Ferraretto (0000-0002-1361-1842, University of Trento), Nicole Hiekel (0000-0002-7180-7931, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, autor de correspondencia), Agnese Vitali (0000-0003-0029-9447, University of Trento)
Año2025
Volumen41
Número1
Páginas25-25
Fecha de publicación2025-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEuropean Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0168-6577 • E-ISSN: 1572-9885
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10680-025-09740-y
PMID41060530
OpenAlexW4414931351
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas57

Living together marks an important step in the progression of intimate partner relationships. While existing literature highlights the relevance of both partners’ economic characteristics for union formation, it remains unclear whether both partners’ economic characteristics are equally linked to the transition to co-residence, whether one partner’s traits matter more, and how this varies by gender. We address these gaps by examining how the economic characteristics of women and men in non-residential relationships relate to their transition to co-residence. Using 13 waves (2008–2021) of the German Family Panel pairfam and Cox proportional hazards model, we analyse 7165 non-residential relationships, capturing dyadic data on partners’ employment status, contract type, and income. Our findings show that economic factors significantly influence the likelihood of moving in together. Couples with two employed partners are most likely to move in together, while gender plays a role when only one partner works—this transition being more likely when the man is employed. Among employed individuals, higher income increases the probability of moving in together for both men and women. Additionally, temporary employment raises the likelihood of starting a co-residence exclusively for women. Overall, results suggest that men’s employment status plays a pivotal role in this transition and that union formation is socially stratified among young adults, reinforcing gender inequalities in partnership dynamics

Economic inequality · General partnership · German · Inequality · Panel data · Perspective (graphical · Relevance (law · Transition (genetics · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Work-Family Balance Challenges

  • Class Differences in Cohabitation Processes

    Open Access•Sassler, Sharon Sassler et al.•Family Relations•2011

  • Regression Models and Life-Tables

    Open Access•D R Cox•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1972

  • Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society

    H P Blossfeld, Hans‐peter Blossfeld et al.•Glazunov•2006

  • Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam)

    Open Access•Johannes Huinink, Josef Brüderl et al.•Journal of Family Research•2011

  • The effect of unemployment on couples separating in Germany and the UK

    Open Access•Alessandro Di Nallo, Oliver Lipps et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2021

  • Migration for co‐residence among long‐distance couples

    Open Access•Roselinde Van Der Wiel, B J Gillespie et al.•Population Space and Place•2022

  • Neither single, nor in a couple. A study of living apart together in France

    Open Access•Arnaud Régnier‐loilier, Arnaud Régnier-Loilier et al.•Demographic Research•2009

  • Couple Formation is Prolonged not Postponed. New Paths to Union Formation in Contemporary France

    Open Access•Marie Bergström, Léonard Moulin•European Journal of Population /…•2022

  • Socioeconomic Resources and the Dissolution of Cohabitations and Marriages

    Open Access•Marika Jalovaara•European Journal of Population /…•2013

  • The Influence of Men’s Income and Employment on Marriage and Cohabitation

    Open Access•M Kalmijn•European Journal of Population /…•2011

  • Mating Market and Dynamics of Union Formation

    Open Access•Giulia Corti, Scherer et al.•European Journal of Population /…•2021

  • Economic Precariousness and the Transition to Parenthood

    Open Access•Daniël Van Wijk, Helga A G De Valk et al.•European Journal of Population /…•2022

  • Moving in or Breaking Up? The Role of Distance in the Development of Romantic Relationships

    Open Access•Sandra Krapf•European Journal of Population /…•2018

  • The Transition to a Coresidential Partnership

    Open Access•Sandra Krapf, Clara H Mulder et al.•Population Research and Policy…•2022

  • Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage

    Open Access•Pamela J Smock, W D Manning•Demography•1997

  • Marriage and Union Formation in the United States

    Open Access•Deirdre Bloome, Shannon Ang•Demography•2020

  • Young Adulthood Relationships in an Era of Uncertainty

    Open Access•W D Manning•Demography•2020

  • The Economic Foundations of Cohabiting Couples’ Union Transitions

    Open Access•Patrick Ishizuka•Demography•2018

  • Transitions From Sexual Relationships Into Cohabitation and Beyond

    Open Access•Sassler, Sharon Sassler et al.•Demography•2018

  • A Theory of the Value of Children

    Open Access•Debra Friedman, Michael Hechter et al.•Demography•1994

  • Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process

    Open Access•Valerie Kincade Oppenheimer•Demography•2003

  • Nonmarital Childbearing in Russia

    Open Access•B Perelli-Harris, T P Gerber•Demography•2011

  • Spatial Mobility, Family Dynamics, and Housing Transitions

    Open Access•Michael Wagner, Clara H Mulder•KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für…•2015

  • Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe

    Open Access•Aart C Liefbroer, Anne‐rigt Poortman et al.•Demographic Research•2015

  • Socio-economic resources and first-union formation in Finland, cohorts born 1969-81

    Marika Jalovaara•Population Studies•2012

  • Marriage and separation risks among German cohabiters

    Nicole Hiekel, Aart C Liefbroer et al.•Population Studies•2015

  • Uncertain steps into adulthood

    Open Access•Luigi Palumbo, Ann Berrington et al.•Population Studies•2023

  • Les relations LAT ou living apart together

    Open Access•Christophe Giraud, Catriona Dutreuilh•Population•2023

  • Leaving and returning to the parental home during Covid times in France, Italy, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Francesca Luppi, Alessandro Rosina et al.•Demographic Research•2024

  • Union formation under conditions of uncertainty

    Open Access•Danilo Bolano, D Vignoli•Demographic Research•2021

  • The diversity in longitudinal partnership trajectories during the transition to adulthood

    Open Access•Barbara Elisabeth Fulda, Barbara Fulda•Demographic Research•2016

  • Uncertain lives

    Open Access•D Vignoli, Valentina Tocchioni et al.•Demographic Research•2016

  • Youth prospects in a time of economic recession

    Open Access•A Aassve, Elena Cottini et al.•Demographic Research•2013

  • Not truly partnerless

    Open Access•Teresa Castro Martins, Teresa Castro Martín et al.•Demographic Research•2008

  • A comparative analysis of leaving home in the United States, the Netherlands and West Germany

    Open Access•Clara H Mulder, Clara Mulder et al.•Demographic Research•2002

  • Does Sex Matter? The Role of Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction on Living Apart Together Relationship Transitions

    Open Access•Alexandra-Andreea Ciritel•Comparative Population Studies•2022

  • From Living Apart to Living Together

    Open Access•Roselinde Van Der Wiel, Clara H Mulder et al.•Comparative Population Studies•2020

  • The Influence of Relationship Quality on the Participation of Secondary Respondents

    Open Access•Jette Schröder, Laura Castiglioni et al.•Comparative Population Studies•2013

  • Living Apart Together

    Open Access•Irene Levin•Current Sociology•2004

  • The Reversal of the Gender Gap in Education and Its Consequences for Family Life

    Jan Van Bavel, Christine R Schwartz et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2018

  • Parents' Partnership Decision Making After Divorce or Widowhood

    Open Access•Jenny De Jong Gierveld, Eva‐maria Merz•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2013

  • Partnering Across the Life Course

    Open Access•Sassler, Sharon Sassler•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2010

  • Unstable employment careers and (quasi-)completed fertility

    Open Access•Giammarco Alderotti, Raffaele Guetto et al.•European Sociological Review•2025

  • The female-breadwinner well-being 'penalty

    Open Access•Helen Kowalewska, Agnese Vitali•European Sociological Review•2024

  • Temporary Employment and Family Formation

    Open Access•Daniël Van Wijk, Helga A G De Valk et al.•European Sociological Review•2021

  • Human Capital Investments or Norms of Role Transition? How Women's Schooling and Career Affect the Process of Family Formation

    Hans-Peter Blossfeld, Hans‐peter Blossfeld et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1991

  • A Theory of Marriage Timing

    Valerie Kincade Oppenheimer•American Journal of Sociology•1988

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae