A Critical Discussion of the Characteristic Properties of List PR and FPTP Systems
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11307870 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eliora Van Der Hout (corresponding author), Jack Stecher (0000-0002-3772-0306), H C M De Swart (0000-0001-6172-676X), Harrie de Swart |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 259-268 |
| Publication date | 2007-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analyse & Kritik (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0171-5860 • E-ISSN: 2365-9858 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/auk-2007-0209 |
| OpenAlex | W1584519463 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This paper discusses the characteristic properties of List PR systems and FPTP systems, as given in Hout 2005 and Hout et al. 2006. While many of the properties we consider are common to both systems, it turns out (see Hout 2005) that the British system distinguishes itself by satisfying the district cancellation property, while the Dutch system distinguishes itself by satisfying consistency and anonymity. For scoring rules, topsonlyness is equivalent to being party fragmentation-proof (see Hout 2005; Hout et al. 2006). One might present this as an argument in favour of requiring topsonlyness. However, we will also give counter-arguments against insisting upon the property of being party fragmentation-proof
Anonymity · Argument (complex analysis · Computer security · Consistency (knowledge bases · Discrete mathematics · Epistemology · Fragmentation (computing · Mathematical economics · Property (philosophy · Computer Science · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |