Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Best practice vs. reality

An exploratory study of communication dynamics during forensic dental and medical examinations in child abuse investigations

Bibliographic Data

ID11339409
AuthorsHayley Ko (0000-0003-4994-4494), Hayley Manalang Ko (OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, corresponding author), Gunn Astrid Baugerud (0000-0003-1322-5316, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University), Miriam S Johnson (0000-0001-7486-2859, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University), Unni‐mette Stamnes Köpp (0000-0002-2877-5874), Unni-Mette Stamnes Köpp (University of Oslo), Ewa A Szyszko Hovden
Year2026
Volume182
Pages108786
Publication date2026-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChildren and Youth Services Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-7409 • E-ISSN: 1873-7765
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108786
OpenAlexW7126092066
LanguageEN
References cited40

Healthcare communication in child abuse cases is an under-researched area. • Healthcare professionals mostly use option-posing utterances. • Open-ended prompts, specifically invitations, were uncommon. • Best practice interviewing should be adapted for forensic health examinations. Forensic health examinations are a routine part of child abuse investigations, yet healthcare professionals may lack the skills required to communicate effectively with victims. Best practice interviewing techniques have been adopted in various professions, yet they have not been widely implemented among healthcare professionals. Little is known about the communication dynamics during forensic health examinations in relation to best practice interviewing principles. Participants included nine youths (aged 13–16) and eight healthcare professionals involved in forensic dental and medical examinations carried out as part of child abuse investigations. Using a hybrid content analysis approach supplemented by inductive coding, healthcare professionals’ utterances were coded to identify the use of open-ended or closed-ended statements. Children’s responses were categorised as descriptive, “don’t know,” or yes/no. The length of each utterance or response was measured by word count. Preliminary revealed that healthcare professionals primarily used option-posing utterances, while invitations were used in only 0.6% of cases. Conversations also lacked a clear structure, with key components such as introductory statements and ground rules inconsistently applied. This study highlights the need to establish best practice interviewing techniques tailored for healthcare settings. Given their crucial role in child abuse investigations, healthcare professionals should receive training in evidence-based communication strategies. Implementing structured interviewing protocols in medical and dental contexts could improve information gathering while ensuring child-centred, ethical, and supportive interactions

Best practice · Child abuse · Clinical Practice · Exploratory research · Forensic science · Health care · Health professionals · Interview · Child Abuse and Related Trauma · Child Abuse and Trauma · Memory Processes and Influences

  • Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences

    Robert A Stebbins, Robert Stebbins•Exploratory Research in the…•2001

  • A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children

    Open Access•Michael E Lamb, Yael Orbach et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2007

  • The Structure of Patients' Presenting Concerns

    J Heritage, Jeffrey D Robinson•Health Communication•2006

  • An analysis of the quality of investigative interviews with children in France

    Fanny Verkampt, Olivier Dodier et al.•Police Practice and Research•2021

  • Doctor–parent–child communication. A (re)view of the literature

    Open Access•Kiek Tates, Ludwien Meeuwesen•Social Science & Medicine•2001

  • Years of Research Into Children’s Irony Comprehension

    Open Access•Julia Fuchs•Pragmatics & Cognition•2023

  • Pragmatic failure and referential ambiguity when attorneys ask child witnesses “do you know/remember” questions

    Open Access•Angela D Evans, Stacia N Stolzenberg et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2017

  • Adherence to the Revised NICHD Protocol recommendations for conducting repeated supportive interviews is associated with the likelihood that children will allege abuse

    Uri Blasbalg, Isaac Hershkowitz et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2020

  • Exploratory studies to inform full-scale evaluations of complex public health interventions

    Open Access•Lindsey Moore, Laurence Moore et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2018

  • The Uses of Humour in Case Management with High-Risk Children and their Families

    Jane F Gilgun, Alankaar Sharma•The British Journal of Social Work•2012

  • Evaluating Child Interviews Conducted by Child Protective Services Workers and Police Investigators

    Open Access•Gunn Astrid Baugerud, Ragnhild Klingenberg Røed et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2023

  • Why Healthcare and Education Professionals Underreport Suspicions of Child Abuse

    Open Access•Jessica Gubbels, Mark Assink et al.•Social Sciences•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae