Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Post-Enlightenment sources of political authority

Biblical atheism, political theology and the Schmitt–Strauss exchange

Bibliographic Data

ID11346146
AuthorsJohn P Mccormick (0000-0001-7305-186X, a University of Chicago , Chicago , IL , United States, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume37
Issue2
Pages175-180
Publication date2011-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory of European Ideas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0191-6599 • E-ISSN: 1873-541X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.11.009
OpenAlexW2000678718
LanguageEN
Citations received10

This essay reevaluates the Weimar writings of Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss, specifically, their intellectual efforts to replace the political authority of Kantian liberalism with, respectively, a ‘political theology’ and ‘Biblical atheism’ derived from the thought of early-modern state theorists like Hobbes and Spinoza. Schmitt and Strauss each insisted that post-Kantian Enlightenment rationality was unraveling into a way of thinking that violently rejected ‘form’ of any kind, fixated myopically on material things and lacked any conception of the external constraints that invariably condition the possibilities of philosophy, morality and politics. They considered Kantian reason and liberal politics to pose serious threats to ‘genuine’ expressions of rationality and as dangerous obfuscations of the necessity of political order—of the brute fact that human beings stand in need of ‘being ruled,’ as such

Atheism · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Liberalism · Morality · Political philosophy · Political science · Political theology · Politics · Rationality · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Merely Political

    Open Access•Theresa A Cooney•Politics, Religion and Political…•2017

  • Theological foundations of the political power ontology

    Open Access•Mikhail Dmitrievich Schelkunov, Olga Olegovna Volchkova et al.•Linguistics and Culture Review•2021

  • Un jeu de miroirs transatlantique

    Bruno Quélennec•Archives de Philosophie•2023

  • From Christian Transcendence to the Maoist Sublime

    Open Access•Hua Tu•Modern Intellectual History•2022

  • Carl Schmitt and the Challenge of Spinoza’s Pantheism Between the World Wars

    Open Access•René Koekkoek•Modern Intellectual History•2014

  • The God of This Lower World”

    Open Access•Beau Shaw•The Review of Politics•2018

  • The return of the intolerant Hobbes

    Boleslaw Z Kabala•History of European Ideas•2019

  • Living the Theologico-Political Problem

    Mark J Lutz•The European Legacy•2019

  • Platonic Theocracy, Liberalism, and Authoritarianism in Leo Strauss'sPhilosophy and Law

    Open Access•John P Mccormick•American Political Science Review•2021

  • On the Tragedy of the Modern Condition

    Facundo Vega•The European Legacy•2017

Citations per year0.83
Citation span2014 - 2023 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae