Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging

Bibliographic Data

ID11354900
AuthorsMichael Siegrist (0000-0002-6139-7190, University of Zurich, corresponding author), Nathalie Stampfli (ETH Zurich), Hans Kastenholz, Carmen Keller (ETH Zurich)
Year2008
Volume51
Issue2
Pages283-290
Publication date2008-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAppetite (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-6663 • E-ISSN: 1095-8304
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.appet.2008.02.020
PMID18406006
OpenAlexW2049355077
LanguageEN
Citations received31
References cited35

Applications of nanotechnology · Business · Food packaging · Food safety · Impact of nanotechnology · Nanotechnology · Naturalness · Perception · Risk perception · Societal impact of nanotechnology · Chemistry · Engineering · Materials Science · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Food Science

  • The importance of food naturalness for consumers

    Open Access•Sergio Román, Luis Manuel Sánchez-Siles et al.•Trends in Food Science & Technology•2017

  • Discussing Nascent Technologies

    Tomiko Yamaguchi•East Asian Science Technology and…•2010

  • Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders

    Open Access•Adam Capon, James Gillespie et al.•BMC Public Health•2015

  • Do information disputes work

    Open Access•Holly Overton, Fan Yang•Journal of Communication Management•2023

  • Risk and benefit perceptions of human enhancement technologies

    Open Access•M KUTTSCHREUTER, Femke Hilverda•Human Behavior and Emerging…•2019

  • Techno-Futures

    Open Access•Christopher Coenen•NanoEthics•2015

  • What drives risk perceptions? Revisiting public perceptions of food hazards associated with production and consumption

    Sarah C Jenkins, Adam J L Harris et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2021

  • Acceptance of nanotechnology in food and food packaging

    Nathalie Stampfli, Michael Siegrist et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Enhanced threat or therapeutic benefit? Risk and benefit perceptions of human gene editing by purpose and heritability of edits

    Emily L Howell, Patrice Kohl et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2020

  • Public perceptions of food-related risks

    Kelsey D Meagher•Journal of Risk Research•2018

  • Social trust and risk perception of genetically modified food in urban areas of China

    Lü Xi, Xiaofei Xie et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2014

  • Nanotechnology, risk and communication

    Å Boholm•Journal of Risk Research•2011

  • Public reception of scientific uncertainty in the endocrine disrupter controversy

    Laura Maxim, Pascale Mansier et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2012

  • Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production

    Open Access•A R H Fischer, Heleen van Dijk et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology

    Open Access•Roxanne I van Giesen, A R H Fischer et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future

    Open Access•Afrodita Marcu, Rui Gaspar et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain

    Open Access•Frédéric Vandermoere, Sandrine Blanchemanche et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Perceptions of science and boundary crossing in human gene editing acceptance

    Open Access•Zeynep Altinay•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2025

  • How Do Individual-Level Characteristics Influence Cross-Domain Risk Perceptions Among Chinese Urban Residents

    Open Access•Yanbo Zhang, Yibao Wang et al.•SAGE Open•2021

  • Discussing Nascent Technologies

    Tomiko Yamaguchi•East Asian Science Technology and…•2010

  • Consumers’ perception of novel foods and the impact of heuristics and biases

    Open Access•Alessandro Monaco, Johannes Kotz et al.•Appetite•2024

  • Nanofood insights

    Open Access•Jean A Parrella, Holli R Leggette et al.•Appetite•2024

  • Complexity and conundrums. Citizens’ evaluations of potentially contentious novel food technologies using a deliberative discourse approach

    Gráinne M Greehy, Mary B Mccarthy et al.•Appetite•2013

  • Food nanotechnology in the news. Coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade

    Open Access•Anthony Dudo, D H Choi et al.•Appetite•2011

  • Food neophobia, nanotechnology and satisfaction with life

    Berta Schnettler, Gloria Crisóstomo et al.•Appetite•2013

  • Consumer fears and familiarity of processed food. The value of information provided by the FTNS

    Open Access•Fabio Verneau, Tiziana De Magistris et al.•Appetite•2014

  • A risk-benefit approach to the purchase and consumption of conventional vegetables in wet markets

    Open Access•Thanh Mai Ha, Helena Hansson et al.•Appetite•2022

  • Convenience food products. Drivers for consumption

    Open Access•Thomas A Brunner, Klazine van der Horst et al.•Appetite•2010

  • Public perception of nanotechnology

    Open Access•Ankita Rathore, G Mahesh•Technology in Society•2021

  • Factors Influencing People’s Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Melanie Connor, Michael Siegrist•Science Communication•2010

  • Protection Motivation and Communication through Nanofood Labels

    Open Access•Christopher L Cummings, Agnes S F Chuah et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2018

  • Public Perceptions of Everyday Food Hazards

    Open Access•Chris Fife‐schaw, Gene Rowe•Risk Analysis•1996

  • Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, Carmen Keller et al.•Risk Analysis•2007

  • Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S.

    Open Access•George Gaskell, Martin W Bauer et al.•Science•1999

  • Nanotoxicology

    Open Access•Günter Oberdörster, Eva Oberdörster et al.•Environmental Health Perspectives•2005

  • Imagining nanotechnology

    Open Access•George Gaskell, Toby Ten Eyck et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2005

  • The social amplification of risk

    Open Access•Jeanne X Kasperson, Roger E Kasperson et al.•Social Amplification of Risk•2003

  • The Affect Heuristic

    Open Access•Paul Slovic, Melissa L Finucane et al.•Heuristics and biases•2002

  • Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks

    Open Access•James Flynn, Paul Slovic et al.•Risk Analysis•1994

  • The Social Amplification of Risk

    Open Access•Jeanne X Kasperson, Eugene A Rosa et al.•Social Amplification of Risk•2003

  • Public Perceptions of the Potential Hazards Associated with Food Production and Food Consumption

    Open Access•Paul Sparks, Robert Shepherd et al.•Risk Analysis•1994

  • Perception of Hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, George Cvetkovich•Risk Analysis•2000

  • A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit

    Open Access•Ali Alhakami, Ali Siddiq Alhakami et al.•Risk Analysis•1994

  • The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Risk Analysis•2000

  • Research Note

    Chris Fife‐schaw, Chris Fife-Schaw et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2000

  • Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, Marie-Eve Cousin et al.•Appetite•2007

  • Perceived naturalness and acceptance of genetically modified food

    Open Access•Petra Tenbült, Nanne K De Vries et al.•Appetite•2005

  • Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China

    Open Access•Jikun Huang, Huanguang Qiu et al.•Appetite•2006

  • Public perception of a range of potential food risks in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Sara F L Kirk, Sara Kirk et al.•Appetite•2002

  • Lay people's perception of food hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, Carmen Keller et al.•Appetite•2006

  • How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff, Paul Slovic et al.•Policy Sciences•1978

  • Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies

    Open Access•Chul-Joo Lee, Chul‐joo Lee et al.•Science Communication•2005

  • Preference for natural

    Open Access•Paul Rozin, Matthew B Ruby et al.•Appetite•2004

Unique citing works31
Citations per year1.94
Citation span2010 - 2025 (16)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 31

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae