Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Associations between motivations for and against eating meat with four types of meat engagement

Bibliographic Data

ID11356709
AuthorsMaxim Trenkenschuh (0009-0001-2200-7612, University of Zurich, corresponding author), João Graça (0000-0001-6868-9420, University of Lisbon), Christopher J Hopwood (0000-0001-6645-8645, University of Zurich)
Year2025
Volume215
Pages108237
Publication date2025-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAppetite (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-6663 • E-ISSN: 1095-8304
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.appet.2025.108237
PMID40712671
OpenAlexW4412609857
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited44

Because of its negative consequences for animal welfare, human health, and the environment, many individuals and institutions are interested in reducing meat consumption. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand the reasons people have both to eat meat (e.g., liking the taste) and to avoid it (e.g., environmental concerns), and how these reasons relate to meat engagement. However, existing research often examines motivations and outcomes in relative isolation, rather than linking different types of motivations to multiple forms of engagement. Here, we examined how general motivations (i.e., overarching tendencies to endorse multiple reasons for and against eating meat) and specific motivations (e.g., taste, environmental concern) relate to various forms of meat engagement - including meat consumption measured through a survey and daily food tracking over 21 days, dietary identity, preferences, and reduction goals - in a sample of N = 4447 Swiss residents. General motivations to avoid meat were associated with lower meat engagement, whereas general motivations to eat meat were associated with higher meat engagement, with the latter effect being stronger. Furthermore, specific motivations were related to specific kinds of engagement. For example, taste was closely related to meat preference, disgust predicted lower identity and consumption, and environmental concern was more strongly linked to reduction goals. These findings suggest that general and specific motivations contribute in distinct ways to how people eat, relate to, and set goals around meat. This highlights the importance of understanding meat-related motivations across target groups to influence dietary attitudes and behavior

Biology · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Insect Utilization and Effects · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Psychology · Food Science

  • Motivations for Plant-Based Diets

    Open Access•Luigina Canova, Andrea Bobbio et al.•Food Ethics•2026

  • Health, environmental, and animal rights motives for vegetarian eating

    Open Access•Christopher J Hopwood, Wiebke Bleidorn et al.•PLoS ONE•2020

  • Development of Food Preferences

    Leann L Birch•Annual Review of Nutrition•1999

  • The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation

    Open Access•Andrew J Elliot•Motivation and Emotion•2006

  • Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets

    Open Access•João Graça, Cristina Godinho et al.•Trends in Food Science & Technology•2019

  • Meat consumption, health, and the environment

    Open Access•H Charles J Godfray, Paul Aveyard et al.•Science•2018

  • Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior

    Noel T Brewer, Gretchen B Chapman et al.•Health Psychology•2007

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera

    Open Access•Sebastian Bamberg, Guido Möser•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2007

  • Theories of motivation

    Open Access•Din Bandhu, M Murali Mohan et al.•Acta Psychologica•2024

  • Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour

    Open Access•Anne M Van Valkengoed, Linda Steg•Nature Climate Change•2019

  • Drivers and causes of zoonotic diseases

    Open Access•Mariana Napolitano Ferreira, Wendy Ellio et al.•PARKS•2021

  • But I Don’t Eat that Much Meat”

    Hank Rothgerber•Society and Animals•2018

  • The psychology of eating animals and veg*nism

    Open Access•Matthew B Ruby, Hank Rothgerber et al.•Appetite•2023

  • The Veg∗n Eating Motives Inventory Plus (Vemi+)

    Open Access•Alexander G Stahlmann, Christopher J Hopwood et al.•Appetite•2024

  • Still eating like there's no tomorrow? A qualitative study to revisit attitudes and awareness around sustainable diets after 10 years

    Open Access•Emily Cleland, David McBey et al.•Appetite•2025

  • What's your beef with meat substitutes? Exploring barriers and facilitators for meat substitutes in omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans

    Open Access•Eleanor Kerslake, Joya A Kemper et al.•Appetite•2022

  • Development and validation of the motivations to Eat Meat Inventory

    Open Access•Christopher J Hopwood, Jared Piazza et al.•Appetite•2021

  • Meat disgust is negatively associated with meat intake – Evidence from a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

    Open Access•Elisa Becker, Natalia S Lawrence•Appetite•2021

  • Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns

    Open Access•Jared Piazza, Matthew B Ruby et al.•Appetite•2015

  • Examining the “Veggie” personality

    Open Access•Tamara M Pfeiler, Boris Egloff•Appetite•2018

  • Health, ethics and environment

    Open Access•N J Fox, Nick Fox et al.•Appetite•2008

  • Meat in context. On the relation between perceptions and contexts

    Open Access•Sara Korzen, Jesper Lassen•Appetite•2010

  • Development and validation of the Dietarian Identity Questionnaire

    Open Access•Daniel L Rosenfeld, Anthony L Burrow•Appetite•2018

  • Meat tastes good, legumes are healthy and meat substitutes are still strange - The practice of protein consumption among Swedish consumers

    Open Access•Elin Röös, Annica de Groote et al.•Appetite•2022

  • Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment

    Charles S Carver, Teri L White•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994

  • Understanding the process of moralization

    Matthew Feinberg, Chloe Kovacheff et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2019

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae