Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Women, Work and Elder Care

The Family and Medical Leave Debate

Bibliographic Data

ID11367529
AuthorsSuzanne England, Suzanne E England (University of Illinois Chicago, corresponding author), Beatrice T Naulleau (University of Illinois Chicago)
Year1991
Volume11
Issue2
Pages91-107
Publication date1991-06-03
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1300/j014v11n02_05
OpenAlexW1481716600
LanguageEN

First introduced in 1984, Family and Medical Leave (FML) legislation would provide some measure of job protection to those who interrupt their employment to provide care for ill or dependent relatives. The original proposals were for 'parental' leave but, as bills and laws evolved, leave to care for an elderly relative began to be included. Opponents of FML object to further regulation of employee benefits and, partly because the groups promoting FML have not found a common and persuasive voice, have been relatively successful in preventing passage or in watering down FML's impact. Comparison of the messages to constituents of two advocacy groups for the elderly, the Older Women's League and the American Association for Retired Persons, illustrates the contradictions and points to the need to come to terms with the conflicts inherent in the ideology of caring

Association (psychology · Ideology · League · Legislation · Object (grammar · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Work (physics · Engineering · Law · Psychology · Retirement, Disability, and Employment

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae