Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Restraining Orders for Battered Women

Issues of Access and Efficacy

Bibliographic Data

ID11367652
AuthorsJanice Grau (corresponding author), Jeffrey Fagan (0000-0003-1483-5554), Sandra Wexler (0000-0002-0046-8725)
Year1984
Volume4
Issue3
Pages13-28
Publication date1984-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
PublisherThe Haworth Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1300/j014v04n03_03
OpenAlexW1811640268
LanguageEN
Citations received25

Since the passage of the Pennsylvania Protection from Abuse Act in 1976, many states have enacted legislation to provide civil restraining orders for battered women. These orders, which offer a civil court alternative to criminal sanctions, are court-issued temporary or permanent orders which direct an assailant to refrain from further abusive conduct. Interviews with recipients of restraining orders suggest that the orders are generally ineffective in reducing the rate of abuse of violence. However, they were effective in reducing abuse for women with less serious histories of family violence or where the assailant was less violent in general. They were ineffective in stopping physical violence. Measures to improve restraining order mechanisms should: more clearly codify abuse and violence, improve access for those not married or cohabitating, streamline procedures and shorten waiting periods, address a full range of child-related concerns, strengthen sanctions, and mandate official responses to violations. Additionally, comprehensive legislation is needed to coordinate civil and criminal remedies

Criminology · Domestic violence · Environmental health · Legislation · Mandate · Poison control · Political science · Sanctions · Suicide prevention · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Law · Medicine · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Psychology

  • An Assessment of Articles About Women in the “Top 15” Political Science Journals

    Open Access•Rita Mae Kelly, Kimberly Fisher•PS Political Science & Politics•1993

  • Evaluating the Efficacy of Protection Orders for Victims of Domestic Violence

    Amanda Burgess-Proctor, Amanda Burgess‐Proctor•Women & Criminal Justice•2003

  • Dependency and Severity of Abuse

    Marilyn Fernandez, Kichi Iwamoto et al.•Women & Criminal Justice•1997

  • Protection Orders and Intimate Partner Violence

    Judith Mcfarlane, Ann Malecha et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2004

  • When “Enough is Enough”

    Open Access•Karla Fischer, Mary Rose•Crime & Delinquency•1995

  • Órdenes de protección en Montevideo, Uruguay

    Open Access•Victoria Gambetta, Cecilia Russo•Investigaciones Feministas•2022

  • Féminisme et criminologie (1988)

    Open Access•Kathleen Daly, Meda Chesney-Lind et al.•Champ pénal•2023

  • The Tactical Topography of Stalking Victimization and Management

    Open Access•Brian H Spitzberg•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2002

  • Feminism and criminology

    Kathleen Daly, Meda Chesney-Lind et al.•Justice Quarterly•1988

  • The Effectiveness of Protection Orders in Reducing Recidivism in Domestic Violence

    Open Access•Reinie Cordier, Donna Chung et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2021

  • Homicides and Intimate Partner Violence

    Open Access•Lorena García, Catalina Soria et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2007

  • Criminal Justice Procedures in Family Violence Crimes

    Delbert S Elliott•Crime and Justice•1989

  • Protective order legislation

    Open Access•Helen Eigenberg, Karen Mcguffee et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2003

  • Abused Women

    Open Access•Ira W Hutchison, J David Hirschel•Violence Against Women•1998

  • A Summary of Personal Protection Order Statutes in the United States

    Open Access•Christina Dejong, Amanda Burgess-Proctor et al.•Violence Against Women•2005

  • Situational Determinants of Police Responses to Civil and Criminal Injunctions for Battered Women

    Open Access•George S Rigakos•Violence Against Women•1997

  • Protective Orders for Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence

    Open Access•María Josefa Badía Herrera, María J Herrera et al.•Violence Against Women•2023

  • A Trial of Telephone Support Services to Prevent Further Intimate Partner Violence

    Open Access•Jack Stevens, Philip V Scribano et al.•Violence Against Women•2015

  • Restraining Orders in California

    Open Access•Susan B Sorenson, Haikang Shen•Violence Against Women•2005

  • A Longitudinal Study of Arrested Batterers, 1995-2005

    Open Access•Andrew R Klein, Terri Tobin•Violence Against Women•2008

  • Law's Progressive Potential

    Open Access•Ruth Lewis, Rebecca Emerson Dobash et al.•Social & Legal Studies•2001

  • Challenging the Negative Assumptions Surrounding Civil Protection Orders

    Open Access•Judy L Postmus•Affilia•2007

  • A Comparison of Civil and Criminal Orders of Protection as Remedies for Domestic Violence Victims in a Midwestern County

    Open Access•Sesha Kethineni, Dawn Beichner et al.•Journal of Family Violence•2009

  • The Meaning of the Protection Order for Abused Women in Israel

    Eli Buchbinder•Journal of Social Service Research•2021

  • Digital photographic evidence and the adjudication of domestic violence cases

    Open Access•Crystal A Garcia•Journal of Criminal Justice•2003

Unique citing works25
Citations per year0,66
Citation span1988 - 2023 (36)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 21

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae