Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Building a low carbon China through Coasean bargaining

Bibliographic Data

ID11374694
AuthorsLennon H T Choy (0000-0001-5690-9334, University of Hong Kong), Winky K O Ho (0000-0002-6333-2833, University of Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume75
Pages139-146
Publication date2018-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHabitat International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0197-3975 • E-ISSN: 1873-5428
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.03.007
OpenAlexW2797126878
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited9

This study explores how an institutional innovation in the 20th Century – Coasean bargaining - could contribute to build a low carbon China in the 21st Century. China has surpassed all nations and become the world's largest emitter of CO2 since 2007. A time-series analysis has revealed that crude oil and coal consumption, inter alia, are the primary factors contributing to the variations in CO2 emissions in China. To honour China's commitments in the Paris Agreement 2015, this paper, with reference to the empirical results, estimates the impacts on various sources of energy consumption before 2030. Developed upon the Coasean bargaining framework (1960), the cap-and-trade (CAT) markets have contributed to reduce the pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions in the US and EU. This paper will illustrate how the CAT market can be complementary to administrative measures for CO2 reduction in China. It will also discuss the institutional settings and constraints of the 7 pilot CAT markets in China, and also the national one to be rolled out in 2017

China · Coal · Coase theorem · Consumption (sociology · Economics · Externality · Greenhouse gas · Honour · Microeconomics · Natural resource economics · Political science · Transaction cost · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Law

  • A reflection on the trading of pollution rights via land use exchanges and controls

    Open Access•Lawrence W C Lai, Frank Lorne et al.•Progress in Planning•2020

  • Modern finance theory and practice and the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Emre Tarim•New Political Economy•2021

  • Research status and trend prospects of the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism

    Open Access•Yexia Zhang, Wei Chen et al.•Environment Development and…•2024

  • Has central environmental protection inspection improved air quality? Evidence from 291 Chinese cities

    Open Access•Jiayi Lin, Cuihong Long et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2021

  • Does Internet Use Increase Public Perception of Environmental Pollution?-Evidence from China

    Open Access•Chengzhi Yi, Jiajun Han et al.•Social Indicators Research•2023

  • The Federal Communications Commission

    R H Coase•The Journal of Law and Economics•1959

  • Adaptation to climate change in the developing world

    Open Access•W Neil Adger, Samia Huq et al.•Progress in Development Studies•2003

  • Toward a low carbon Hong Kong

    Open Access•Lennon H T Choy, Winky K O Ho et al.•Habitat International•2013

  • The implementation of climate change related policies at the subnational level

    Open Access•José Antonio Puppim De Oliveira•Habitat International•2009

  • The mitigation/adaptation conundrum in planning for climate change and human settlements

    Open Access•Rafael E Pizarro•Habitat International•2009

  • On Freedom and Free Enterprise

    W E Armstrong, Mary Sennholz•Economica•1957

  • The Economics of Welfare

    Arthur Cecil Pigou, Nahid Aslanbeigui•The Economic Journal•2017

Citations per year0.83
Citation span2020 - 2024 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae