The “six-line essay” writing intervention for first-year philosophy students
A preliminary report
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11420308 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ewa Latecka (0000-0002-0524-5774, University of Zululand, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 411-422 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | South African Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0258-0136 • E-ISSN: 2073-4867 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02580136.2020.1846286 |
| OpenAlex | W3112193624 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
This article aims at presenting the argument for the modification of Dennis Earl’s “four-sentence paper” template into the “six-line essay” writing intervention. The underlying reason for this research is a relative paucity of literature covering the topic of philosophy writing interventions at a beginner’s level. In order to fill this gap, the article takes the following course. For general background, it presents the general views on teaching essay writing and the relative unavailability of philosophy-directed methods and techniques. It then describes Earl’s template in relative detail. Further, it refers to my experience teaching philosophical writing to University of Zululand students. Next, it describes the specific group of students with whom I first tried the method in 2019 and whose needs prompted the modifications. I then explain the “six-line essay” model step by step, commenting on the rationale behind each step and the way in which it is presented to students. True to form, the article also presents objections and the relevant counterarguments. Finally, the article points to the possibility of further, more structured research, with formal questionnaires/structured interviews and their subsequent analysis
Art · Epistemology · Literature · Mathematics education · Sociology · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Philosophy · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education
| Highly cited | No |
|---|