Testing the Focusing Hypothesis of the Mannheim Model of Speech Production
Desperately Seeking Activation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11444647 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Heidi Egel (Lehrstuhl für Psychologie III, Universität Mannheim, Schloss, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany, corresponding author), Theo Herrmann (0000-0002-6745-0562, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie III, Universität Mannheim, Schloss, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany), Anke Scheven (Lehrstuhl für Psychologie III, Universität Mannheim, Schloss, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany) |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 169-179 |
| Publication date | 1988-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Language and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0261-927X • E-ISSN: 1552-6526 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0261927x8800700402 |
| OpenAlex | W2073622341 |
| Language | EN |
Herrmann (1985) has developed a three-stage model of speech production. The three levels comprise: (1) focusing a propositional output basis, (2) selection and linearisation, and (3) encoding. In order to speak, a speaker has to turn her/his attention to those situational aspects s/he intends to talk about. Out of the set of focused elements will be selected only those appropriate for the utterance intended to be encoded next. The different processing levels should be characterised by different activational states. The aim of this study was to investigate the first stage of the model. The focusing hypothesis was tested by means of the lexical decision task, and the experimental results confirmed the hypothesis
Cognitive psychology · Economics · Encoding (memory · Linguistics · Production (economics · Production model · Selection (genetic algorithm · Set (abstract data type · Situational ethics · Speech production · Speech recognition · Task (project management · Utterance · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |