Navigating the new EU deforestation regulation in the coffee industry
Challenges and prospects for remote-sensing solutions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11465613 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sinne Borby Ørtenblad (0000-0002-6779-3485, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author), Martin Rudbeck Jepsen (0000-0002-1107-7260, University of Copenhagen), Louis Reymondin (0000-0002-8022-9977, Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT), Thibaud Vantalon (Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT), Christian Bunn (0000-0003-2175-8745, Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT), Tiffany Talsma (Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT), Anne Gravsholt Busck (0000-0002-7328-795X, University of Copenhagen) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 164 |
| Pages | 107965 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Land Use Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107965 |
| OpenAlex | W7126470409 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
The coffee industry faces a critical juncture with the recent introduction of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). This policy demands stringent traceability and reporting on deforestation risks associated with seven key globally traded commodities based on remote sensing. With a focus on coffee, this paper synthesizes insights from survey results, interviews, and engagement with operators placing coffee on the EU market, and an examination of remote-sensing solutions. The paper articulates the industry's preparedness for EUDR compliance and discusses the way forward. The paper also highlights persistent challenges to accurately mapping tree-crop commodities and agroforestry systems at a global scale, along with the accompanying risk of falsely detecting deforestation related to coffee grown under such systems. This is particularly the case for smallholder-based production and poses a consequent risk of operators abandoning such regions. The results also show that the operators currently have insufficient capabilities for processing remote-sensing data to demonstrate or verify that their product is not sourced from deforested areas. Successful implementation of the EUDR requires solutions that are accessible to the operators and that build community- and operator-level capacity in Remote Sensing and georeferencing. The Terra-i + initiative offers a promising solution that can be tailored to the coffee sector and showcases successful calibration and accurate mapping outcomes. However, it is important to strike an appropriate balance between global expediency and local precision. The paper proposes a standardized bottom-up approach, where global standards are defined collaboratively, yet implementation remains locally led, mitigating risks of misclassification, and ensuring the inclusion of vulnerable smallholder producers. • The new EU Deforestation Regulation addresses EU's contribution to global deforestation. • There are persistent challenges to accurately mapping tree-crop commodities and agroforestry. • This poses risk of falsely detected deforestation related to coffee from agroforestry systems. • Successful implementation requires new community- and operator-level Remote Sensing capacity. • Global standards should be defined collaboratively, yet implementation should be locally led
Deforestation (computer science · European union · Key (lock · Product (mathematics · Production (economics · Traceability · Coffee research and impacts · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Disentangling the numbers behind agriculture-driven tropical deforestation
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Deforestation displaced
The evolution of power in the global coffee value chain and production network
Potential impacts of the proposed EU regulation on deforestation-free supply chains on smallholders, indigenous peoples, and local communities in producer countries outside the EU
Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments
Vulnerability to Cumulative Hazards
Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World
| Highly cited | No |
|---|