Harmonization potential of the fragmented farmlands in Finland
The pros and cons for critical parcel characteristics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11467439 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio, Pirjo Peltonen‐Sainio (0000-0002-1083-2201, Natural Resources Institute Finland, corresponding author), Lauri Jauhiainen (0000-0003-2073-1057, Natural Resources Institute Finland), Roope Näsi (0000-0002-5823-8180, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute), Eetu Puttonen (0000-0003-0985-4443, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute), Eija Honkavaara (0000-0002-7236-2145, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 147 |
| Pages | 107380 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Land Use Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107380 |
| OpenAlex | W4403067239 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
Agricultural landscapes have been shaped by gradual, partially optimized changes in farms and surrounding areas which have resulted in fragmented agricultural landownership and increased distances on farms. Since Finland joined the EU in 1995, the average farm size has more than doubled which has increased the distances on farms. This may have caused trade-offs with resource use efficiency, productivity, and sustainability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential and impacts of land reallocation by integrating regional variability, logistical factors, and emerging satellite imagery, with an emphasis on enhancing resilience in future climates. This study estimated the theoretical potential for land reallocation between farms to reduce farmland fragmentation but also applied fixed land exchange rates (5 % to 40 %) with the primary aim to reduce distances within each farm depending on the farm size and region. The aim was also to identify co-benefits and trade-offs on the number of parcels in a farm, the production capacity of exchanged parcels, diversification potential, and the proximity of parcels to waterways. While keeping the farm size constant, large potential was found to optimize fragmented landscapes and reduce distances within farms especially on large farms. However, only a moderate exchange rate of 5 % almost halved the distances in the best cases of the farms, while exchange rates >20 % provided less additional logistic benefits. Thereby, modest, well targeted measures are not only more acceptable to landowners but may provide the most benefits with fewer trade-offs. In unsatisfactory cases, large parcels were replaced by higher numbers of smaller ones, productivity differences occurred, and closer parcels became more uniform, which may reduce diversification options, which are important for resilience and sustainability. Hence, merging and reshaping nearby parcels after reallocation might be needed to complete rationalization. Estimated changes in the proximity of the parcels to waterways tended to improve the farmers’ readiness to implement irrigation as an adaptation measure to climate change. The variable outcome of parcel reallocation emphasizes the central role of the current customer-driven consolidation system chaired by independent land surveyors to boost the land reallocation also in the future to improve logistics, resource efficiency, and sustainability on farms that today struggle with cost-crises. • Since joining the EU (1995) farm size has doubled and distances within farm increased • High potential to reduce distances exists in large farms in agriculture dominated regions • Modest exchange land rates provide relatively more benefits and less trade-offs • Causes compromises for parcel size, productivity and diversification potential • No compromises caused for opportunities to irrigate in the future
Business · cons · Environmental protection · Geography · Harmonization · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Computer Science · Forest Management and Policy · Rural development and sustainability
Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France
Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience
Land consolidation
Determining the effect of land consolidation on agricultural production using a novel assessment framework
Natural resources and agriculture during the Iron Age in Ostrobothnia, western Finland, investigated by pollen analysis
Environment and agriculture of the transitional period from the Late Bronze to early Iron Age in the eastern Baltic
They call it progress, but we don’t see it as progress’
Early agrarian landscapes in finland
Field characteristics driving farm-scale decision-making on land allocation to primary crops in high latitude conditions
Trends in land ownership fragmentation during the last 230 years in Czechia, and a projection of future developments
Agricultural impacts and profitability of land consolidations
Land use optimization tool for sustainable intensification of high-latitude agricultural systems
Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity
Evaluating the double effect of land fragmentation on technology choice and dairy farm productivity
The relationship between agricultural land parcel size and cultivation costs
Land reform, land fragmentation and perspectives for future land consolidation in Estonia
On the structural development of arable land in Finland – How costly will it be for the climate
Time to look for evidence
Economic, social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia
Cultivated land productivity potential improvement in land consolidation schemes in Shenyang, China
Assessing the effectiveness of land consolidation for improving agricultural productivity in China
Cultivation History Beyond the Periphery
Transition to farming in Northern Europe
| Highly cited | No |
|---|