The Place of Relic Worship in Buddhism
An Unresolved Controversy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11469723 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Karel Werner (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 71-87 |
| Publication date | 2013-10-07 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Buddhist Studies Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0265-2897 • E-ISSN: 1747-9681 |
| Publisher | Equinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1558/bsrv.v30i1.71 |
| OpenAlex | W2132157406 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
Although worship of the relics of the Buddha — and its corollary, st?pa worship — is a widespread feature of Buddhist devotional practice among both lay Buddhists and monks, there is in some quarters a view that, while recommended to lay followers, it is forbidden to monks. This controversy started very early after the Buddha’s parinibb?na and has reverberated throughout the centuries till the present time. Its source is in the Mah?parinibb?na Sutta, and it stems from the ambiguity in the meaning of the compound sar?ra-p?j? in the Buddha’s reply to ?nanda’s two questions concerning the actions to be taken after the Master’s death with respect to his body. The resolution of the controversy depends on a correct understanding of the nature of the Buddha’s replies to the two questions. This paper analyses the relevant passages of the sutta and the way they have been translated, correctly or incorrectly, into Western languages and into Chinese, and finally arrives at a solution derived entirely from within the text of the Mah?parinibb?na Sutta itself
Ambiguity · Art · Buddhism · Corollary · Epistemology · Gautama Buddha · Linguistics · Literature · Theology · Worship · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Mathematics · Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions · Philosophy · Religious studies
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1969 - 2024 (56) |
| Highly cited | No |