Engineering the revolution? Imagining the role of new digital technologies in infrastructure work futures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11489396 |
|---|---|
| Authors | P Leonard (0000-0002-8112-0631, Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology University of Southampton Southampton UK, corresponding author), Roger Tyers (0000-0002-0187-0468, Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology University of Southampton Southampton UK) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 291-310 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Technology Work and Employment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0268-1072 • E-ISSN: 1468-005X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ntwe.12226 |
| OpenAlex | W4200174324 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 27 |
Contemporary imaginations of the impact of new digital technologies (NDTS) are dominated by utopian visions of a ‘revolution’ in productivity and efficiency, contrasted with dystopian views of declines of work and human skills, and distrust of artificial intelligence's efficacy. This article explores imaginations of digital futures in the infrastructure sector through case study research of a global engineering organisation. Drawing on a practice approach, a typology is generated from interviews with engineers and managers to reveal that three broad imaginations compete within the organisation: technodeterminism; technoscepticism; and human‐centric, all with utopian and dystopian variants. Clear relationships exist between the diverse imaginary positions taken by employees with their different roles, biographies and levels of the organisational agency. Those with relatively higher levels of agency tended towards technocentric utopianism while those with lower levels of agency displayed a resolutely dystopian version. Conversely, while the outward‐facing image of the organisation promotes a utopian imagination of a technologically driven future, those with the very highest levels of the organisational agency remain technosceptic. This means that real change is slow. However, an encouraging manifesto for the future is suggested by those who are innovating NDTS to reimagine alternative infrastructure futures through improved human‐centric social outcomes
Business · Digital Revolution · Dystopia · Futures contract · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Vision · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Engineering · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Law · Management and Organizational Studies
The effect of digital economy on rural workforce occupation transformation ability
Middle managers' agency in shaping socially disruptive technologies
Looking at human-centered artificial intelligence as a problem and prospect for sociology
A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations
Unboxing reskilling narratives
Typologies and Taxonomies
Design Justice
The Future of the Professions
What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing
Critical social theory and the end of work
A Case Study of the Failure of Digital Communication to Cross Knowledge Boundaries in Virtual Construction
Risk
Dreamscapes of Modernity
Ethnographic Methods
The Sociology of the Future
When should workers embrace or resist new technology
Fear and hope in an age of mass automation
Rethinking country effects
New new technologies
Mapping themes in the study of new work practices
Plus ca change, plus la meme chose?'—researching and theorising the ‘new’ new technologies
A conceptual-empirical typology of social science research methods pedagogy
Rise of the robots
Postcapitalism
On Technological Determinism
Technology, innovation, employment and power
Work in and beyond the Second Machine Age
New connections
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |