Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Analyzing the debates on the issue of indigenization of social sciences in China

A perspective of performance

Bibliographic Data

ID11495477
AuthorsNing Wang (0009-0007-8931-918X, Department of Sociology, School of Humanities, Southeast University, China, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume40
Issue2
Pages185-205
Publication date2025-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0268-5809 • E-ISSN: 1461-7242
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/02685809251325002
OpenAlexW4409352560
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited8

In the previous disputes on the indigenization of social science, Chinese scholars mainly focused on whether the Western social science knowledge is universal, so that it is applicable to China, and ignored the attitude differences between different disciplines of social science on the issue of knowledge indigenization in China. These attitude differences reflect a deeper problem of knowledge ontology. Knowledge ontology claims that reality is in part the result of idea performance. As far as China is concerned, whether the knowledge of Western social science is applicable to China depends on whether the Western modern ideas are performable in China. The performability of these ideas in China varies with different domains: the instrumental domain and the value field. Most scholars in the instrumental domain are inclined to accept the position of knowledge cosmopolitanism (universality of knowledge), while most scholars in the value domain adopt the position of knowledge localism (indigenization of knowledge). Which domain becomes the instrumental one and which field becomes the value one are defined by the state. Many Chinese intellectuals formed the motivation and confidence of the indigenization of social science, mainly because of the change of national cultural identity

China · Epistemology · Indigenization · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy

  • A Metasociological Outline of the Legitimacy of Sociology

    Open Access•Jingxi Zhang•The American Sociologist•2026

  • Localization and normalization

    Open Access•Jie Hu, Xiaohong Zhou•International Sociology•2025

  • Japan, who governs?

    Chalmers A Johnson•Japan, who governs?•1995

  • Miti and the Japanese Miracle

    Chalmers Johnson, Chalmers A Johnson•MITI and the Japanese Miracle•1982

  • China as a Developmental State

    Open Access•John Knight, John B Knight•World Economy•2014

  • Studies in ethnomethodology

    Harold Garfinkel•Studies in ethnomethodology•1984

  • Growth and Development of China

    Nikolaos Karagiannis, Moula Cherikh et al.•Forum for Social Economics•2020

  • The social construction of reality

    Peter L Berger, Peter L Luckmann Thomas A Berger et al.•The social construction of reality•1967

  • The Indigenization Debate in China

    Open Access•Junpeng Li, Songying Xu et al.•Journal of Historical Sociology•2022

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo
Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae