Women on top
Coital positions and gender hierarchies in Renaissance Italy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11499583 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marlisa Den Hartog (0000-0002-2575-3960, Leiden University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 638-657 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Renaissance Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-1213 • E-ISSN: 1477-4658 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/rest.12718 |
| OpenAlex | W3125429866 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
According to Christian theology, the ‘missionary’ position was the only proper way to have sex. Among clerical as well as secular authors, one of the most serious deviations from this prescription was the position with the woman on top of the man. Although medieval and early modern defences of the woman‐on‐top prohibition are often focused on reproduction or health, modern scholars habitually explain it as a reflection of concern about the inversion of gender roles and hierarchies. Against the background of the hierarchical perspective on sexual intercourse in general, this hypothesis seems almost self‐evident. Thus far, however, it has not been sufficiently supported with relevant source material. This article brings a focused case study of this topic to the historiography by analyzing the discussion of the woman‐on‐top position in Italian sources written between c. 1350‐1550. Theological, medical and literary sources are used to support the hypothesis that the woman‐on‐top prohibition was to an important extent sanctioned by beliefs about gender roles and hierarchies. There were various ways in which the ‘missionary’ position could be defended, ranging from defences of innate male prerogatives to concern about female power
Art · Art history · Historiography · Perspective (graphical · Position (finance · Power (physics · Sociology · The Renaissance · Gender Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Psychology · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |