A Second Comment on Homogeneity of Regression
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11504247 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William E Geeslin (Stanford University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 636-638 |
| Publication date | 1970-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-8312 • E-ISSN: 1935-1011 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3102/00028312007004636 |
| OpenAlex | W1987528777 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 4 |
In the comment section of the November AERJ, Halperin (1969) seems to suggest that homogeneity of regression techniques may be impossible to calculate. Halperin points out correctly that there are some notational errors in Wilson and Carry's article (Wilson and Carry, 1969). However, Halperin adds to the confusion rather than merely correcting the mistakes. The simplest way to correct the Wilson and Carry paper is as follows
Carry (investment · Confusion · Econometrics · Economics · Homogeneity (statistics · Mathematical economics · Regression · Regression analysis · Statistics · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Computer Science · Mathematics · Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety · Psychology · Statistical Methods and Inference
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1971 - 1971 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |