Analysis of an Innovation (CLEP)”
A Reply
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11560753 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edward Caldwell (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 474-475 |
| Publication date | 1974-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1546 • E-ISSN: 1538-4640 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00221546.1974.11776983 |
| OpenAlex | W2315327644 |
| Language | EN |
1. A normative cut-off score was recommended by the American Council on Education for which it furnished no criteria to defend, 2. The recommended cut-off score represented unusually low raw scores for some tests, 3. The technical material ordinarily furnished by the publisher made it difficult for consumers to know how much content the normative scores represented, 4. Content of the tests was heavily saturated with typical high school material, 5. The normative data itself is of questionable accuracy because proportions of students that meet a given normative cut-off vary extensively from one test to another
Mathematics education · Normative · Political science · Raw data · Raw score · Statistics · Test (biology · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|