Universal Periodic Review
Contemporaneity, originality and research agendas
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11588014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marcos Vinícius de Castro (0000-0003-3141-0195, Universidade de Brasília, corresponding author), Isabela Gerbelli Garbin Ramanzini (0000-0002-7056-021X, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-7329 • E-ISSN: 1983-3121 |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/0034-7329202400220 |
| OpenAlex | W4404851096 |
| SCIELO_PID | S0034-73292024000200202 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is the most recent addition to the United Nations’ mechanisms to monitor human rights worldwide. Its creation in 2007 symbolized a more cooperative and less asymmetrical alternative for the treatment of human rights than more traditional mechanisms. The body of literature on UPR usually offers two attributes to it: contemporaneity and originality. While both generically denote the emergence of a “new” element in the international system; individually, each one makes up a different idea. This article proposes a precise and analytically dense elaboration on these attributes by examining (i) the political-normative paradigm at its creation, as well as (ii) the UPR’s originality factors compared to other traditional human rights mechanisms. This specific exam helps resolve possible analytical-conceptual mismatches between the UPR and the more traditional human rights mechanisms. It also allows for the identification of gaps and potentials to expand the academic knowledge and the professional performance in the UPR’s practical field
Epistemology · Originality · Social science · Sociology · Global Energy Security and Policy · Philosophy · Policy Transfer and Learning · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
The relational politics of shame
African States
The Use of International Human Rights Law in the Universal Periodic Review
Of Shaming and Bargaining
Decriminalisation of Sexual Orientation through the Universal Periodic Review
A Voice Not an Echo
The Temporal Ontology of the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review
The Role and Influence of Non-governmental Organisations in the Universal Periodic Review—International Context and Australian Case Study
Breaking the Ban? The Heterogeneous Impact of US Contestation of the Torture Norm
Smoke and mirrors at the United Nations’ universal periodic review process
Malaysia's Human Rights Performance
Opportunities for Nongovernmental Organization Advocacy in the Universal Periodic Review Process at the UN Human Rights Council
(Geo)Politics of Universal Periodic Review
NGOs invite attention
The United Kingdom, the United Nations Human Rights Council and the first cycle of the Universal Periodic Review
India at the crossroads? Civil society, human rights and religious freedom
Leaving the Doors Open or Keeping Them Closed? The Impact of Transparency on the Authority of Peer Reviews in International Organizations
North Korea’s participation in the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights
The UN Human Rights Council
Rhetorical Inaction? Compliance and the Human Rights Council of the United Nations
Deliberative Capacity Building through International Organizations
Fears of peers? Explaining peer and public shaming in global governance
Os EUA e a Revisão Periódica Universal do Conselho de Direitos Humanos da ONU
A Temática Migratória Na Revisão Periódica Universal Dos Eua
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |