Opportunities for Nongovernmental Organization Advocacy in the Universal Periodic Review Process at the UN Human Rights Council
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12930299 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lauren Moss (Lawrence University, corresponding author), L C Moss |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 122-150 |
| Publication date | 2010-02-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Rights Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1757-9619 • E-ISSN: 1757-9627 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jhuman/hup031 |
| OpenAlex | W2054937152 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process in the UN Human Rights Council offers new high-profile opportunities for nongovernmental organization (NGO) advocacy to improve the observance of human rights. Some of the most significant opportunities lie not in the proceedings in the Human Rights Council in Geneva, but internally in societies around the world. NGOs can engage in a continuous cycle of advocacy built around UPR: advocating for national consultations, special procedure visits, and ratification of human rights treaties; submitting information to treaty monitoring bodies and in the UPR process itself; advocating for the acceptance of recommendations made in UPR and then for implementation of those recommendations. NGO submissions for use in the UPR process are published on the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) UPR website page for the state involved, and become part of a central reference for anyone looking at the human rights record of that government. OHCHR guidelines should be followed. NGOs should lobby states to make specific recommendations to the states under review. Governments may be lobbied to accept them both at their Geneva Mission and at home in their national capitals. Recommendations should call on states to take clearly identified measures. NGOs should continue advocacy to urge states to implement the commitments they made. UPR is useful for advocacy on the full range of human rights issues. UPR provides a new opportunity to address recommendations to violator states and focus international pressure to correct abuses and unjust practices. For states truly open to improvement, UPR offers an opportunity to get the attention of high-level officials and policy-makers for human rights problems
Government (linguistics · Human rights · International human rights law · Political science · Politics · Ratification · State (computer science · Treaty · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Human Rights and Development · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Public Administration
Universal Periodic Review and its Limited Change Potential
(Geo)Politics of Universal Periodic Review
State promotion of global women’s rights in the Universal Periodic Review
Naming and praising states? Mena women’s NGO rhetoric at the universal periodic review
Evidence for Hope? Assessing the Role of the UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteurs on the Course of the Palestinian Question
NGOs invite attention
Challenging impunity in Indonesia and the Philippines through the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism
A network analysis of naming and shaming in the universal periodic review
You scratch my back, and I scratch yours
Universal Periodic Review
National Human Rights Institutions as Expert Actors in Global Human Rights Governance
Universal Periodic Review and Policy Change
The Impact of the Universal Periodic Review and the State Reporting Procedure of UN Treaty Bodies on the Prosecution of Hate Crimes
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,3 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |