Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Pokrovsky's rehabilitation

A reply to Bernard W. Eissenstat

Bibliographic Data

ID11601237
AuthorsGeorge M Enteen, George Enteen (Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author)
Year1970
Volume22
Issue2
Pages295-297
Publication date1970-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSoviet Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-5859
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09668137008410753
OpenAlexW1992580590
LanguageEN

THERE are certain ambiguities, it seems, in my article, 'Soviet Historians Review Their Own Past: The Rehabilitation of M. N. Pokrovsky', that have led the reader to misunderstand my interpretation of the subject. Professor Eissenstat has understood me to view Pokrovsky's rehabilitation as the outcome of efforts by Soviet historians to appease their consciences. Furthermore, he suggested by inference that I do not consider 'the response of the party to new domestic and foreign conditions' to be among the causes of Pokrovsky's rehabilitation. Neither assertion renders my position accurately. I regret the misunderstanding. I ought now to state my position and report my findings in more general terms

Assertion · Conscience · Economics · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Library science · Linguistics · Political science · Position (finance · Regret · State (computer science · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Rehabilitation · Soviet and Russian History

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae