Pens, Polls, and Theories
The 1990 Nicaraguan Election Revisited: A Reply to Anderson
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11623968 |
|---|---|
| Authors | K Bischoping (0000-0001-7637-1877), Howard Schuman |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 495-495 |
| Publication date | 1994-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2111415 |
| OpenAlex | W2322401024 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
In Neutrality and Bias in the 1990 Nicaraguan Preelection Polls, Leslie Anderson makes three critical points about our article, Pens and Polls in Nicaragua: An Analysis of the 1990 Preelection Surveys (Bischoping and Schuman 1992). She claims that the design of the pen experiment was defective due to our unawareness of the potential significance of color in Nicaraguan politics; asserts that the DOXA polling organization was able to avoid the suspicions of partisanship that dogged other survey organizations; and portrays our conclusion as a misleading call for bias in future surveys in polarized settings
Economics · Neutrality · Political science · Politics · Polling · Positive economics · Sociology · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Social Media and Politics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |