The Etiology of the Occurrence of En Banc Review in the U.S. Court of Appeals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11623975 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Micheal W Giles (Emory University), Virginia A Hettinger (0000-0002-8193-4248), Christopher Zorn (0000-0003-3103-330X, University of South Carolina), Todd C Peppers (Roanoke College) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 449-463 |
| Publication date | 2007-06-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00261.x |
| OpenAlex | W2073205740 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 29 |
The U.S. Courts of Appeals, working principally through three‐judge panels, constitute important final arbiters of the meaning of the federal constitution, laws, and regulations and, hence, significant policymakers within the federal system. En banc rehearing—reconsideration of the decision of a three‐judge panel by the full complement of judges appointed to the circuit—is an institutional device that ensures circuit decisions are in line with the established preferences of the circuit. The use of en banc varies in frequency across circuits and within circuits over time. Drawing on legal, attitudinal, and strategic perspectives of judicial behavior, we develop and test a set of integrated expectations regarding the causes of this variation. Our analysis finds support for the operation of all three models and suggests that the influence of ideology on the use of en banc in the recent era is not unique but part of a long‐standing pattern
Complement (music · Constitution · Ideology · Law and economics · Meaning (existential · Political science · Politics · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Test (biology · Variation (astronomy · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Psychology
The Impact of Attorney Gender on Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeals
Signaling and Counter‐Signaling in the Judicial Hierarchy
Strategic Anticipation of En Banc Review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
Legal Constraint in the US Courts of Appeals
Delegation, Compliance, and Judicial Decision Making in the Court of Justice of the European Union
The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Decisions
Strategic Anticipation and En Banc Oversight Procedures in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
Judges and Friends
Rethinking Regime Politics
How institutions structure judicial behaviour
Influencing Enforcement
Consider the Source (and the Message)
Courting the President
Experimental Justice
Is the Sum Greater than Its Parts? Circuit Court Composition and Judicial Behavior in the Courts of Appeals
Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts
Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited
Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System
Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine
Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics
Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data
Setting a Judicial Agenda
Picking Federal Judges
Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales
The Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court
Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting
Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals
Two Faces of Power
Decision-Making Rules and Judicial Strategy on the United States Courts of Appeals
Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,94 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2023 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |