Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Picking Federal Judges

A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas

Bibliographic Data

ID7972094
AuthorsMicheal W Giles (Emory University), Virginia A Hettinger (0000-0002-8193-4248, Indiana University), Todd C Peppers (Emory University), Todd Peppers (Emory University)
Year2001
Volume54
Issue3
Pages623
Publication date2001-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/449273
OpenAlexW4237540308
LanguageEN
Citations received150
References cited35

The importance of lower federal courts in the policymaking process has stimulated extensive research programs focused on the process of selecting the judges of these courts and the factors influencing their decisions. The present study employs judicial decisionmaking in the U.S. Courts of Appeals as a window through which to reexamine the politics of selection to the lower courts. It differs from previous studies of selection in three ways. First, it takes advantage of recent innovations in measurement to go beyond reliance on political party as a measure of the preferences of actors in the selection process. Second, employing these new measures it examines the relative effects of the operation of policy and partisan agendas in the selection process. Third, a more complex model of selection is assessed than in most previous studies-one that expressly examines the role of senators and senatorial preferences in the selection process. The results clearly suggest that the politics of selection differ dramatically depending upon whether or not senatorial courtesy is in operation. The voting behavior of Courts of Appeals judges selected without senatorial courtesy is consistent with the operation of a presidential policy agenda. Among judges selected when senatorial courtesy is in play, the linkage between presidential preferences and judicial outcomes disappears

Courtesy · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Process (computing · Selection (genetic algorithm · Sociology · Voting · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration

  • Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals

    Sean Farhang, Sara Farhang•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2004

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein, A D Martins et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2007

  • Text classification of ideological direction in judicial opinions

    Open Access•Carina I Hausladen, Marcel H Schubert et al.•International Review of Law and…•2020

  • The Judging Game

    Open Access•Leo Katz, Alvaro Sandroni•The Journal of Legal Studies•2025

  • Presidential Selection of Supreme Court Nominees

    Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2019

  • Thumb on the Scale

    Open Access•Maurice E Baker, Matthew E Baker•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights

    Open Access•Salmon A Shomade, Roger E Hartley et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • Nuclear Fallout

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Michael S Lynch et al.•The Forum•2015

  • The Influence of Home-State Reputation and Public Opinion on Federal Circuit Court Judges

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Patrick C Wohlfarth•Journal of Law and Courts•2019

  • US Supreme Court Law Clerks as Information Sources

    Open Access•Christopher D Kromphardt•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • To Stay or Not to Stay

    Open Access•Banks Miller, Brett Curry•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • Binders Full of Judges

    Open Access•Alicia Uribe‐mcguire•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • How Judicial Qualification Ratings May Disadvantage Minority and Female Candidates

    Open Access•Malcolm Sen•Journal of Law and Courts•2014

  • The Chief Justice as Executive

    Open Access•Dawn M Chutkow•Journal of Law and Courts•2014

  • The Costs of Going Global

    Open Access•Maureen Stobb•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • The Influence of Federalist Society Affiliation on Senator Voting in Federal Judicial Nominations

    Open Access•Christine C Bird, Jonathan M King et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Measuring Judicial Ideology Through Text

    Open Access•Jake S Truscott, Michael K Romano•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Quality in Measurement Matters

    Open Access•James A Sieja•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Rules, Standards, and Lower Court Decisions

    Open Access•Joseph L Smith, James A Todd•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Beyond Liberal and Conservative

    Open Access•Rob Robinson, Brendon Swedlow•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Judicial Impact and Factual Allegations

    Open Access•Morgan L W Hazelton•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Promotion, Social Identity, and Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Jeffrey Budziak•Journal of Law and Courts•2016

  • She’ll Settle It

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • Panel Effects and Opinion Crafting in the US Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Rachael K Hinkle•Journal of Law and Courts•2017

  • Measuring How Much Judges Matter for Case Outcomes

    Open Access•Ryan Copus, Ryan Hübert•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Packing the Courts

    Open Access•Elli Menounou, Adam Feldman et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Party Capability and the US Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•John Szmer, Donald R Songer et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2016

  • Legislating Incentives for Attorney Representation in Civil Rights Litigation

    Open Access•Sean Farhang, Douglas M Spencer•Journal of Law and Courts•2014

  • The Differential Effect of War on Liberal and Conservative Judges on the US Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Susanne Schorpp, Rebecca A Reid•Journal of Law and Courts•2017

  • The Emerging Authority of Magistrate Judges within US District Courts

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Tracey E George et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • Judicial behavior in disability cases

    Christina L Boyd, Adam G Rutkowski•Politics Groups and Identities•2020

  • The impact of maleness on judicial decision making

    Rebecca D Gill, M Kagan et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2017

  • How policy influence varies with race and gender in the US courts of appeals

    Open Access•Rachael K Hinkle•Research & Politics•2021

  • Of Whites and men

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Tillman, Rachael K Hinkle•Research & Politics•2018

  • Representing Public Opinion

    Open Access•Thomas R Marshall•Politics & Policy•2003

  • Strategic Anticipation and En Banc Oversight Procedures in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Joshua A Strayhorn•American Politics Research•2019

  • Trading Liberties for Security

    Open Access•Rebecca A Reid, Susanne Schorpp et al.•American Politics Research•2019

  • Bargaining and Legal Development in the United States Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•American Politics Research•2013

  • Judges and Friends

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Wendy L Martinek•American Politics Research•2014

  • How You Rate Depends on Who Investigates

    Open Access•James A Sieja•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Judicial Ambition and the Crafting of Law

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • The Curious Case of the Migrating Seat

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Patrick Rickert et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Judicial Specialization and Ideological Decision Making in the US Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Brett Curry, Banks Miller•Law & Social Inquiry•2013

  • Experts Judging Experts

    Open Access•Banks Miller, Brett Curry•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • When “Best Practices” Win, Employees Lose

    Open Access•Linda H Krieger, Rachel Kahn Best et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • Presidential Decision Making and Minority Nominations to the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Mitchell Killian•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Assessing Changes in State Representation on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Kevin M Scott, R Sam Garrett•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Serving the Law or Playing Politics? The Strategic Use of U.S. Attorney Appointments

    Open Access•Christina M Kinane, Lauren Mattioli•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Presidential Success in Supreme Court Appointments

    Open Access•Matthew P Hitt•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2013

  • The Etiology of the Occurrence of En Banc Review in the U.S. Court of Appeals

    Open Access•Micheal W Giles, Virginia A Hettinger et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Signaling and Counter‐Signaling in the Judicial Hierarchy

    Open Access•Deborah Beim, Alexander V Hirsch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Strategic Anticipation of En Banc Review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Rachael K Hinkle•Law & Society Review•2016

  • How Interpersonal Contact Affects Appellate Review

    Michael J Nelson, Morgan L W Hazelton et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Setting a Judicial Agenda

    Micheal W Giles, Thomas G Walker et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • The Impact of Courts on Public Management

    Open Access•Andrew Osorio, Rosemary O’leary•Administration & Society•2017

  • Friends of the Circuits

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2010

  • Shaping the Federal Courts

    Open Access•T J Kimel, Kirk A Randazzo•Social Science Quarterly•2012

  • Revue des revues

    Kim Fridkin Kahn, Cécile Hatier et al.•Revue française de science…•2002

  • Litigant status, judicial ideology, and the gatekeeping of expert evidence

    Open Access•Timothy O'Brien, Stephen Hawkin et al.•Law & Society Review•2026

  • The Constraining Effect of “History and Tradition”

    Open Access•Rebecca L Brown, Lee Epstein et al.•The Annals of the American…•2024

  • Judicial Specialization and Deference in Asylum Cases on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Maureen Stobb, Joshua B Kennedy•American Political Science Review•2023

  • The Path of Law

    Open Access•Anthony R Taboni•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court

    Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Individual Scrutiny or Politics as Usual? Senatorial Assessment of U.S. District Court Nominees

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Kjersten R Nelson et al.•American Politics Research•2014

  • The Voting Behavior of Minority Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Jason L Morin•American Politics Research•2014

  • Strategic Anticipation and the Hierarchy of Justice in U.S. District Courts

    Open Access•Kirk A Randazzo•American Politics Research•2008

  • Change over Tenure

    Open Access•Erin B Kaheny, Susan B Haire et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Collegial Influence and Judicial Voting Change

    Open Access•Scott R Meinke, Kevin M Scott•Law & Society Review•2007

  • Rethinking Critical Mass in the Federal Appellate Courts

    Laura P Moyer, Laura Moyer•Women & Politics•2013

  • Checking the Federal Courts

    Kirk A Randazzo, Richard W Waterman et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Voting for Justices

    Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Legal Constraint in the US Courts of Appeals

    Rachael K Hinkle•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Ideological Influences on Decision Making in the Federal Judicial Hierarchy

    Christopher Zorn, Jennifer Bowie et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • The Information Dynamics of Vertical Stare Decisis

    Thomas G Hansford, James F Spriggs et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Hierarchical and Collegial Politics on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Jonathan P Kastellec•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Learning in the Judicial Hierarchy

    Deborah Beim•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Lower Court Influence on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content

    Pamela C Corley, Perry Mcd Collins et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Jurisdiction Stripping

    Dawn M Chutkow•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Consider the Source (and the Message)

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • Elevation Potential among Circuit Court Nominees and Its Effect on the Senate’s Confirmation Behavior

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Bias and the Bar

    Open Access•Susan Navarro Smelcer, Amy Steigerwalt et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • Solicitor General Influence and Agenda Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Tradeoffs and Spillovers in U.S. Criminal Immigration Enforcement

    Open Access•Maureen Stobb, Banks Miller et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2025

  • Expertise, Experience, and Ideology on Specialized Courts

    Open Access•Banks Miller, Brett Curry•Law & Society Review•2009

  • Justice Without Borders

    Open Access•Jeffrey Davis•Law & Policy•2005

  • Measuring Ideological Polarization on the Circuit Courts of Appeals 1953-2022

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • The Changing Politics of Federal Judicial Nominations

    Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • Strategic Defiance and Compliance in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Chad Westerland, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • The Intergroup Foundations of Policy Influence

    Open Access•Rachael K Hinkle, Michael J Nelson•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • On the Relationship between Public Opinion and Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Bryan Calvin, Perry Mcd Collins et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • The Federalist Society's Influence on the Federal Judiciary

    Open Access•Nancy Scherer, Banks Miller•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Institutions, Interests, and Judicial Outcomes

    Open Access•Brett Curry•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Revisiting Senatorial Courtesy and the Selection of Judges to the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Nicholas O Howard, David A Hughes•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Gender, Race, and Intersectionality on the Federal Appellate Bench

    Open Access•Todd Collins, Todd A Collins et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Panel Composition and Voting on the U.S. Courts of Appeals over Time

    Open Access•Jonathan P Kastellec•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • The Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Lower Federal Courts

    Open Access•Tajuana D Massie, Thomas G Hansford et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • The Politics of Requesting Appointments

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus, Daniel E Bergan•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Trying to Get What You Want

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Rachel A Schutte et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • The Political Responsiveness of Violent Crime Prosecution

    Open Access•Ethan D Boldt, Christina L Boyd•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Issue Evolution

    E G Carmines, James A Stimson•Issue Evolution•2020

  • Measuring the ideological preferences of U.S. presidents

    Open Access•Mark A Zupan•Public Choice•1992

  • Federal Judges

    R H Clark, Harold W Chase•The Western Political Quarterly•1973

  • Lawyers and Judges

    Clifford M Lytle, Joel B Grossman•The Western Political Quarterly•1965

  • Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales

    Keith T Poole•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Trial Courts‘ Responses to Supreme Court Policy Changes

    Open Access•Ronald Stidham, Robert A Carp•Law & Policy•1982

  • Separating Partisanship from Party in Judicial Research

    Open Access•Randall D Lloyd•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers

    Open Access•Tim Groseclose, Steven D Levitt et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting

    Donald R Songer, Susan B Haire et al.•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Judges' Policy Choices and the Value Basis of Judicial Appointments

    C K Rowland, Robert A Carp et al.•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Where You Stand Depends on Who Sits

    C K Rowland, Bridget Jeffery Todd•The Journal of Politics•1991

  • An Institutional Analysis of Turnover in the Lower Federal Courts, 1900- 1987

    Deborah J Barrow, Gary Zuk•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • The Impact of the Supreme Court on Trends in Economic Policy Making in the United States Courts of Appeals

    Donald R Songer•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process

    P S Ruckman, P S Ruckman P S Ruckman•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • The Senate Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court Nominees

    Frank Guliuzza, Daniel J Reagan et al.•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices

    Jeffrey A Segal, Jeffrey Segal•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93

    William D Berry, Evan J Ringquist et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Linear Models for Evaluating Conditional Relationships

    Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright•American Journal of Political…•1976

  • Consensual and Nonconsensual Decisions in Unanimous Opinions of the United States Courts of Appeals

    Donald R Songer•American Journal of Political…•1982

  • Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88

    C Neal Tate, Roger Handberg•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data

    Open Access•Gary King, James Honaker et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Presidential Effects on Criminal Justice Policy in the Lower Federal Courts

    Open Access•C K Rowland, Donald R Songer et al.•Law & Society Review•1988

  • Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers

    Open Access•Herbert Mcclosky, Paul J Hoffmann et al.•American Political Science Review•1960

  • Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United States

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson, Gerald C Wright et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • The Impact of Party and Region on Voting Decisions in the United States Courts of Appeals, 1955-1986

    Open Access•Donald R Songer, Sue Davis•The Western Political Quarterly•1990

  • Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals, 1961-1964

    Open Access•Sheldon Goldman•American Political Science Review•1966

  • The Policy Consequences of Senate Involvement in the Selection of Judges in the United States Courts of Appeals

    Donald R Songer•The Western Political Quarterly•1982

  • Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited

    Open Access•Sheldon Goldman•American Political Science Review•1975

Unique citing works150
Citations per year6,25
Citation span2002 - 2026 (25)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 150

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae