Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices

Partisan and Institutional Politics

Bibliographic Data

ID6384397
AuthorsJeffrey A Segal (State University of New York, corresponding author), Jeffrey Segal (0000-0001-8405-8346)
Year1987
Volume49
Issue4
Pages998-1015
Publication date1987-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/2130781
OpenAlexW2142654669
LanguageEN
Citations received50
References cited13

A president's most important appointments are to the Supreme Court of the United States. Unlike cabinet officers, the Senate does not routinely confirm Supreme Court justices. To study this phenomenon, I propose four related models of confirmation. The models assume senators to be political persons motivated by both partisan and institutional concerns. The data consist of 138 confirmation decisions, with the parameters estimated by probit. The models explain between 38% and 42% of the variance in confirmation decisions, while predicting 87% and 88% of the cases correctly. Institutional politics are at least as important as partisan politics in predicting decisions

Cabinet (room · Econometrics · Economics · Political science · Politics · Probit model · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Variance (accounting · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Water Quality and Resources Studies

  • Senate Gate-Keeping, Presidential Staffing of “Inferior Offices,” and the Ideological Composition of Appointments to the Public Bureaucracy

    Adam Bonica, Jowei Chen et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2015

  • Lower Federal Court Judicial Confirmation Fights

    Open Access•Salmon A Shomade, Roger E Hartley et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • Forecasting the Senate vote on the Supreme Court vacancy

    Open Access•Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•Research & Politics•2016

  • Ideological Voting on Chile's Constitutional Tribunal

    Royce Carroll, Lydia Brashear Tiede et al.•Journal of Human Rights•2012

  • Conceptual and measurement limitations of the Biennial Congress

    Eric Paul Svensen•Journal of Legislative Studies•2020

  • Presidents, Political Regimes, and Contentious Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Kevin J Mcmahon•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • L'Accord du lac Meech et le nouveau mode de sélection des juges de la Cour suprême du Canada

    Open Access•André Bzdera•Canadian Journal of Law and…•1989

  • Congressional Response to Statements of Administration Policy and Presidential Signing Statements

    Scott H Ainsworth, Scott Ainsworth et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2014

  • Choosing When to Choose

    Charles R Shipan, Brooke Thomas Allen et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2014

  • Senate confirmation of cabinet nominations

    Open Access•James D King•The Social Science Journal•1996

  • Senate confirmation of cabinet appointments

    James D King, James W Riddlesperger et al.•The Social Science Journal•2013

  • The contingency of Senate consent

    Open Access•Stephen R Routh•The Social Science Journal•2003

  • Avoiding Advice and Consent

    Open Access•Pamela C Corley•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2006

  • The Last One Hundred Days

    Open Access•William G Howell, Kenneth H Mayer et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Picking Federal Judges

    Micheal W Giles, Virginia A Hettinger et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2001

  • No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews

    Open Access•Dion Farganis, Justin Wedeking•Law & Society Review•2011

  • The Role of Nominee Gender and Race at U.S. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Perry Mcd Collins et al.•Law & Society Review•2018

  • The Effects of Information on the Accuracy of Presidential Assessments of Supreme Court Nominee Preferences

    Open Access•John Szmer, Donald R Songer•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade

    Open Access•Philip G Chen, Amanda Clare Bryan•Political Behavior•2017

  • Representative Appointments

    Udi Sommer•Women & Politics•2013

  • To Advise and Consent

    Wendy L Martinek, Mark Kemper et al.•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Sounding the Fire Alarm

    Nancy Scherer, Brandon L Bartels et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Presidential Capital and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process

    Timothy R Johnson, Jason M Roberts•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process

    P S Ruckman, P S Ruckman P S Ruckman•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • The Senate Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court Nominees

    Frank Guliuzza, Daniel J Reagan et al.•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Reexamining the Impact of the Bork Nomination to the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Ayo Ogundele, Linda Camp Keith•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • Retrospective and Prospective Voting in Presidential-Year Elections

    David J Lanoue•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions

    Open Access•James F Spriggs•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • The Politics of Requesting Appointments

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus, Daniel E Bergan•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Calling It Quits

    James F Spriggs, Paul J Wahlbeck•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • African-American Constituents and Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•L Marvin Overby, Beth M Henschen et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Politics and personal factors in retirement from the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Political Behavior•1988

  • Understanding court nominee evaluation and approval

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Lewis S Ringel•Political Behavior•1995

  • The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations

    Bryon J Moraski, Bryon Moraski et al.•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • The Who, When, and Where of Executive Nominations

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Lawrence S Rothenberg•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947-1998

    Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Lobbying for Justice

    Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Delaying Justice(s)

    Charles R Shipan, Megan L Shannon•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Marginality Hypothesis and Supreme Court Confirmation Votes in the Senate

    Robert J Mcgrath, James A Rydberg•Congress & the Presidency•2016

  • InstitutionalConflict andPerceivedPropertyRights inAppointmentPolitics

    David C Nixon•Congress & the Presidency•2014

  • Roll Call Votes on Cabinet Confirmations

    James D King, James W Riddeesperger•Congress & the Presidency•2006

  • The Nominations Presidents Make

    Artemus Ward•Congress & the Presidency•2001

  • Confirmation Delay for Vacancies on the Circuit Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•David Nixon, David C Nixon et al.•American Politics Research•2001

  • Moving Up the Judicial Ladder

    Open Access•Kathleen A Bratton, Rorie L Spill•American Politics Research•2004

  • The Changing Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations

    Open Access•Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•American Politics Research•2012

  • Can the Senate Examine the Constitutional Philosophies of Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Michael Comiskey•PS Political Science & Politics•1993

  • Presidential Policy Preferences and Supreme Court Appointment Success

    Open Access•John B Gates, Jeffrey E Cohen•Review of Policy Research•1989

  • From Abe Fortas to Zoë Baird

    Open Access•Glen S Krutz, Glen Krutz et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Albert D Cover et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas

    Open Access•L Marvin Overby, Beth M Henschen et al.•American Political Science Review•1992

  • Congressmen's Voting Decisions

    John W Kingdon, John Kingdon•Congressmen's voting decisions•1989

  • Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis

    Donald E Farrar, Robert R Glauber•The Review of Economics and…•1967

  • The Advice and Consent of the Senate

    Leon D Epstein, Joseph P Harris et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1954

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • The Senate of the United States

    Molina V José E, George H Haynes•The Western Political Quarterly•1960

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Electoral choice in 1972

    John H Aldrich•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1977

  • A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables

    Richard D Mckelvey, William Zavoina•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1975

  • Senate Confirmation of Appointments to the U.S. Supreme Court

    Jan Palmer•Review of Social Economy•1983

  • Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Joseph Tanenhaus, Walter F Murphy•The Journal of Politics•1981

  • Probing the Bounds of Conventional Wisdom

    John Aldrich, John H Aldrich et al.•American Journal of Political…•1975

  • The Rôle of the Senate in the Confirmation of Judicial Nominations

    Open Access•Kenneth C Cole•American Political Science Review•1934

Unique citing works50
Citations per year1,32
Citation span1988 - 2020 (33)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 50

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae