Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations

A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices

Bibliographic Data

ID6231671
AuthorsBryon J Moraski, Bryon Moraski (0000-0001-9344-4548), Charles R Shipan (0000-0002-1348-5479)
Year1999
Volume43
Issue4
Pages1069
Publication date1999-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2991818
OpenAlexW2321372108
LanguageEN
Citations received118
References cited16

When a vacancy occurs on the Supreme Court, the president can attempt to use his power of nomination strategically in order to bring the Court in line with his own policy preferences. However, the president faces two constraints when attempting to do so. First, he may be constrained by the presence of continuing justices and the existing Court median. Second, he may be constrained by the Senate, which must approve his nominee. In this paper we develop and test a theory that examines the conditions under which a president is constrained in his choice of a nominee. Our results show that presidents can, and do, behave strategically with respect to Supreme Court nominations

Economics · Law and economics · Nomination · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Supreme court · Test (biology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein, A D Martins et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2007

  • The American Congress

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith et al.•American Congress•2011

  • The New Separation‐of‐Powers Approach to American Politics

    Rui J P De Figueiredo, Tonja Jacobi et al.•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • The Political Economy of the US Presidency

    Charles M Cameron•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting

    Open Access•Keith T Poole•Spatial Models of Parliamentary…•2005

  • Courts under Constraints

    Open Access•Gretchen Helmke•Courts under Constraints•2004

  • Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Thomas H Hammond et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Presidential Selection of Supreme Court Nominees

    Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2019

  • O senado e as aprovações de autoridades

    Open Access•Leany Barreiro Lemos, Leany Barreiro De S Lemos et al.•Revista Brasileira de Ciências…•2007

  • Keeping the Outliers in Line? Judicial Review of State Laws by the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall, Ryan C Black•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • Nuclear Fallout

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Michael S Lynch et al.•The Forum•2015

  • Executives Strike Back

    Open Access•Matthew Montgomery, Natalie Rogol et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Binders Full of Judges

    Open Access•Alicia Uribe‐mcguire•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • The Purpose of Senatorial Grandstanding during Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

    Open Access•Jessica A Schoenherr, Elizabeth A Lane et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Analyzing the Rhetoric of Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

    Open Access•Jake S Truscott•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • Forecasting the Senate vote on the Supreme Court vacancy

    Open Access•Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•Research & Politics•2016

  • Analysing constitutional reform in Britain

    Open Access•Ben Seyd•British Politics•2013

  • Beyond Judicialization

    Open Access•Christoph Hönnige•European Political Science•2010

  • The Impact of Divided Government on the Supreme Court Appointment Process

    Open Access•Hemant Sharma, John M Scheb•Politics & Policy•2011

  • Senate Gate-Keeping, Presidential Staffing of “Inferior Offices,” and the Ideological Composition of Appointments to the Public Bureaucracy

    Adam Bonica, Jowei Chen et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2015

  • A Regression Discontinuity Design for Studying Divided Government

    Open Access•Patricia A Kirkland, Jane H Phillips•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • May It Please the Senate

    Open Access•Michael K Romano, Nickelette M Justice•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Changing Senate Norms

    Mark E Owens, Mark Owens•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • Democratic Representation of all “the People”

    Open Access•John D Griffin, Grace Sager•Studies in American Political…•2020

  • Rethinking Regime Politics

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • Presidents, Political Regimes, and Contentious Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Kevin J Mcmahon•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • Pivotal Politics, Presidential Capital, and Supreme Court Nominations

    Timothy R Johnson, Jason M Roberts•Congress & the Presidency•2005

  • Choosing When to Choose

    Charles R Shipan, Brooke Thomas Allen et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2014

  • Presidential Decision Making and Minority Nominations to the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Mitchell Killian•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • The Power of Presidential Partisanship

    Open Access•Natalie Rogol, Anna Mccaghren Fleming et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Assessing Congressional Responses to Growing Presidential Powers

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Michael S Lynch et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Prioritizing Judicial Nominations after Presidential Transitions

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Ian Ostrander•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Agreeable Administrators? Analyzing the Public Positions of Cabinet Secretaries and Presidents

    Open Access•Anthony M Bertelli, Christian R Grose•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2007

  • The Revolution in Presidential Studies

    Open Access•Terry M Moe•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Studying the Polarized Presidency

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2002

  • Qualifications or Philosophy? The Use of Blue Slips in a Polarized Era

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Anthony J Madonna et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Political Context, White House Centralization, and the Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Federal Courts

    Open Access•Justin Pottle, Jon C Rogowski et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Presidential Success in Supreme Court Appointments

    Open Access•Matthew P Hitt•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2013

  • The Legislative Design of Judicial Review

    Open Access•Charles R Shipan•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2000

  • Storable votes and judicial nominations in the US Senate

    Open Access•Alessandra Casella, Sébastien Turban et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2017

  • Justice Bork, or, be careful which supreme court nominees you choose to fight

    Open Access•Mikel Norris•Social Science Quarterly•2024

  • Shaping the Federal Courts

    Open Access•T J Kimel, Kirk A Randazzo•Social Science Quarterly•2012

  • Policy Making and Appointments under Electoral and Judicial Constraints

    Peter Bils, Gleason Judd et al.•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Whose trade follows the flag? Institutional constraints and economic responses to bilateral relations

    Open Access•Qin Chen, Chen Qin et al.•Journal of Peace Research•2021

  • Los conflictos intergubernamentales entre España y Cataluña

    Open Access•Jean-Baptiste Harguindéguy, Emilio Rodríguez-López et al.•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2024

  • Vou indicar quem toma cerveja comigo

    Open Access•Lucas Magalhães, Mateus Morais Araújo et al.•Política & Sociedade•2023

  • Taking It to the Next Level

    Open Access•Elisha Carol Savchak, Thomas G Hansford et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Advice and Consent

    Nolan Mccarty, Rose Razaghian•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor

    Michele L Swers, Christine C Kim•Women & Politics•2013

  • Representative Appointments

    Udi Sommer•Women & Politics•2013

  • To Advise and Consent

    Wendy L Martinek, Mark Kemper et al.•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Advising and Consenting in the 60-Vote Senate

    David W Rohde, Kenneth A Shepsle•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Judicial Majoritarianism

    Matthew E K Hall, Joseph Daniel Ura•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Checking the Federal Courts

    Kirk A Randazzo, Richard W Waterman et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Predicting Drift on Politically Insulated Institutions

    Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Recruitment of Chief Justices on State Supreme Courts

    Laura Langer, Jody Mcmullen et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Legal Institutions and Democratic Survival

    Christopher Reenock, Jeffrey K Staton et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees

    Jonathan P Kastellec, Jeffrey R Lax et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • The Power to Appoint

    David Cottrell, Charles R Shipan et al.•The Journal of Politics•2019

  • Voting for Justices

    Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Presidential Capital and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process

    Timothy R Johnson, Jason M Roberts•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Case selection and Supreme Court pivots

    Open Access•Greg Sasso, Gleason Judd•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • Institutions, Interests, and Judicial Outcomes

    Open Access•Brett Curry•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • The Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Lower Federal Courts

    Open Access•Tajuana D Massie, Thomas G Hansford et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Ignoring Advice and Consent? The Uses of Judicial Recess Appointments

    Open Access•Scott E Grave, Scott E Graves et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Confirmation Wars, Legislative Time, and Collateral Damage

    Open Access•Anthony J Madonna, James E Monogan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • The Politics of Requesting Appointments

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus, Daniel E Bergan•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • From Consent to Advice and Consent

    Open Access•Marcus E Hendershot•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•Brian R Sala, James F Spriggs•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Adding Recess Appointments to the President's “Tool Chest” of Unilateral Powers

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Anthony J Madonna et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • The Effects of Information on the Accuracy of Presidential Assessments of Supreme Court Nominee Preferences

    Open Access•John Szmer, Donald R Songer•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • A Competing Risks Model of Supreme Court Vacancies, 1789–1992

    Open Access•Christopher J W Zorn, Christopher Zorn et al.•Political Behavior•2000

  • Partisan Politics

    Open Access•Lisa A Solowiej, Wendy L Martinek et al.•Party Politics•2005

  • Senator Opposition to Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Lawrence J Zigerell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Judicial Procedures as Instruments of Political Control

    Open Access•Joseph L Smith•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Appointment Politics and the Ideological Composition of the Judiciary

    Open Access•Edward H Stiglitz•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • The Senatorial Courtesy Game

    Open Access•Tonja Jacobi•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Female and Minority Judicial Nominees

    Open Access•Nicole Asmussen, Nicole Jo Asmussen•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • The Limits of Senatorial Courtesy

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • Divided We Quarrel

    Open Access•David C W Parker, Matthew Dull•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Policy dynamics and electoral uncertainty in the appointments process

    Open Access•Jinhee Jo, David Primo et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2017

  • Vacancies, vetting, and votes

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2015

  • Now or later? A dynamic analysis of judicial appointments

    Open Access•Jinhee Jo•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2017

  • While there’s a breath in my body

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey, Albert Yoon•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2011

  • How uncertainty about judicial nominees can distort the confirmation process

    Open Access•Malcolm Sen, Maya Sen et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2017

  • Rational incompetence

    Open Access•Jinhee Jo, Lawrence S Rothenberg•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2012

  • Appointee vacancies in US executive branch agencies

    Open Access•William G Resh, Gary E Hollibaugh et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2021

  • Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics

    Open Access•Jeffrey K Staton, Will H Moore•International Organization•2011

  • Models of Vetoes and Veto Bargaining

    Charles M Cameron, Charles Cameron et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2004

  • Regimes and the Rule of Law

    Gretchen Helmke, Frances Mccall Rosenbluth et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2009

  • Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • The Appointments Dilemma

    Open Access•Nolan Mccarty•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space

    Open Access•Tom S Clark, Benjamin E Lauderdale et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Courting the President

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Supreme Court Appointments as a Move‐the‐Median Game

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel, Kieth Krehbiel•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947-1998

    Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Delaying Justice(s)

    Charles R Shipan, Megan L Shannon•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Who Consents? Competing Pivots in Federal Judicial Selection

    Open Access•David Primo, David M Primo et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • The Marginality Hypothesis and Supreme Court Confirmation Votes in the Senate

    Robert J Mcgrath, James A Rydberg•Congress & the Presidency•2016

  • The Politics of Presidential Speeches

    Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • Measuring the ideological preferences of U.S. presidents

    Open Access•Mark A Zupan•Public Choice•1992

  • Shaping America

    Open Access•Henry J Abraham•Political Science Quarterly•1996

  • The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees

    Richard D Friedman, John Anthony Maltese•American Journal of Legal History•1997

  • Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Albert D Cover•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers

    Open Access•Tim Groseclose, Steven D Levitt et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

  • The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process

    P S Ruckman, P S Ruckman P S Ruckman•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices

    Jeffrey A Segal, Jeffrey Segal•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • Politics and personal factors in retirement from the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Political Behavior•1988

  • Strategic retirements

    Open Access•Timothy M Hagle•Political Behavior•1993

  • Institutional and Partisan Sources of Gridlock

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1996

  • Lobbying for Justice

    Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting

    Jeffrey A Segal, Charles M Cameron et al.•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • May It Please the Chief? Opinion Assignments in the Rehnquist Court

    Forrest Maltzman, Paul J Wahlbeck•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Albert D Cover et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas

    Open Access•L Marvin Overby, Beth M Henschen et al.•American Political Science Review•1992

Unique citing works118
Citations per year4,37
Citation span1999 - 2025 (27)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 118

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae