Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting

Senators, Constituents, Presidents, and Interest Groups in Supreme Court Confirmations

Bibliographic Data

ID6230099
AuthorsJeffrey A Segal, Charles M Cameron (0000-0003-0421-9870), Albert D Cover
Year1992
Volume36
Issue1
Pages96
Publication date1992-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2111426
OpenAlexW2333934924
LanguageEN
Citations received99
References cited36

We test a spatial model of Supreme Court confirmation votes that examines the effects of (1) the ideological distance between senators' constituents and nominees, (2) the personal ideologies of senators, (3) the qualifications of the nominee, (4) the strength of the president, and (5) the mobilization for and against nominees by interest groups. The data consist of the 1,475 individual confirmation votes from the 1955 nomination of John Harlan until the 1987-88 nomination of Anthony Kennedy (voice votes excluded). All of the above factors significantly affect confirmation voting. The model explains 78% of the variance in senators' decisions, predicts 92% of the individual votes correctly, and predicts all of the aggregate outcomes correctly

Economics · Ideology · Nomination · Political science · Politics · Supreme court · Variance (accounting · Voting · Voting behavior · Accounting · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law

  • The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy

    Paul Burstein, A Linton et al.•Social Forces•2002

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein, A D Martins et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2007

  • The New Separation‐of‐Powers Approach to American Politics

    Rui J P De Figueiredo, Tonja Jacobi et al.•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • Interest groups

    Open Access•Jan Potters, Randolph Sloof•European Journal of Political…•1996

  • Strategic compromise, policy bundling and interest group power

    Open Access•Luna Bellani, Vigile Marie Fabella et al.•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • Interest Organizations, Information, and Policy Innovation in the U.S. Congress 1 2

    Open Access•Paul Burstein, C Elizabeth Hirsh•Sociological Forum•2007

  • The Supreme Court’s Partisan Composition Affects How Americans Evaluate Nominees

    Open Access•Victor Wu, Yusaku Horiuchi•Journal of Law and Courts•2026

  • Party Defection in Senate Confirmations of Executive Nominees

    Ryan Bookstein, Kristina C Miler•Congress & the Presidency•2026

  • Financiamiento de campañas y cabildeo

    Open Access•Diego Solís Delgadillo, Josafat Cortez Salinas•Revista Mexicana de Ciencias…•2022

  • Keeping the Outliers in Line? Judicial Review of State Laws by the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall, Ryan C Black•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • Nuclear Fallout

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Michael S Lynch et al.•The Forum•2015

  • Binders Full of Judges

    Open Access•Alicia Uribe‐mcguire•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media

    Open Access•A Gunderson, Kirsten Widner et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • From Textbook Pluralism to Modern Hyperpluralism

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Cody Gray et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Forecasting the Senate vote on the Supreme Court vacancy

    Open Access•Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•Research & Politics•2016

  • Ad-dressing the bench

    Open Access•Christine C Bird, Rachael Houston et al.•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2025

  • Legislators and interest groups

    Yael Yishai•Journal of Legislative Studies•1997

  • May It Please the Senate

    Open Access•Michael K Romano, Nickelette M Justice•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Communicating the Politics of the Law

    Open Access•Albert H Rivero, Andrew Stones et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Rethinking Regime Politics

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • Electoral Messages from the District

    Douglas D Roscoe•Congress & the Presidency•2003

  • Choosing When to Choose

    Charles R Shipan, Brooke Thomas Allen et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2014

  • Senate confirmation of cabinet nominations

    Open Access•James D King•The Social Science Journal•1996

  • Senate confirmation of cabinet appointments

    James D King, James W Riddlesperger et al.•The Social Science Journal•2013

  • The contingency of Senate consent

    Open Access•Stephen R Routh•The Social Science Journal•2003

  • Liberal–conservative conflict and consensus in policy making

    Open Access•Carl Grafton, Anne Permaloff•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • Representation, Voluntary Retirement, and Shirking in the Last Term

    Open Access•Charles Tien, Charles P Tien•Public Choice•2001

  • The pew and the bench

    Open Access•Drew Noble Lanier, Mark S Hurwitz•Social Science Quarterly•2024

  • Public policy for business and the economy Ideological dissensus, change and consensus

    Open Access•Carl Grafton, Anne Permaloff•Policy Sciences•2001

  • The Senate and Justice Thomas

    L Marvin Overby•Congress & the Presidency•1994

  • Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited

    Jeffrey A Segal, Lee Epstein et al.•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Interest Group Influence in the U. S. Congress

    Open Access•Richard A Smith•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1995

  • Taking It to the Next Level

    Open Access•Elisha Carol Savchak, Thomas G Hansford et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Backlash and Legitimation

    Open Access•Joseph Daniel Ura•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor

    Michele L Swers, Christine C Kim•Women & Politics•2013

  • Representative Appointments

    Udi Sommer•Women & Politics•2013

  • Campaigning for the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, C E Smith•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • Advising and Consenting in the 60-Vote Senate

    David W Rohde, Kenneth A Shepsle•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Checking the Federal Courts

    Kirk A Randazzo, Richard W Waterman et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • The Lobbying Activities of Organized Interests in Federal Judicial Nominations

    Gregory A Caldeira, Marie Hojnacki et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees

    Lee Epstein, René Lindstädt et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees

    Jonathan P Kastellec, Jeffrey R Lax et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges

    Paul Brace, Laura Langer et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Sounding the Fire Alarm

    Nancy Scherer, Brandon L Bartels et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Voting for Justices

    Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Presidential Capital and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process

    Timothy R Johnson, Jason M Roberts•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • The Senate Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court Nominees

    Frank Guliuzza, Daniel J Reagan et al.•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Appointment Delay for Vacancies on the Federal Communications Commission

    Open Access•David C Nixon•Public Administration Review•2001

  • The Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Lower Federal Courts

    Open Access•Tajuana D Massie, Thomas G Hansford et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • The Allocation of Party Controlled Campaign Resources in the House of Representatives, 1989-1996

    Open Access•David F Damore, Thomas G Hansford•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • Reexamining the Impact of the Bork Nomination to the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Ayo Ogundele, Linda Camp Keith•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • Legislative Coalitions and Judicial Turnover under Political Uncertainty

    Open Access•Santiago Basabe-Serrano, J Polga-Hecimovich•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Opinion-Holding and Public Attitudes Toward Controversial Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Robin M Wolpert•Political Research Quarterly•1996

  • Confirmation Wars, Legislative Time, and Collateral Damage

    Open Access•Anthony J Madonna, James E Monogan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Witnesses at the Confirmations? The Appearance of Organized Interests at Senate Hearings of Federal Judicial Appointments, 1945-1992

    Open Access•Roy B Flemming, Michael Macleod et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • African-American Constituents and Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•L Marvin Overby, Beth M Henschen et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • The Effects of Information on the Accuracy of Presidential Assessments of Supreme Court Nominee Preferences

    Open Access•John Szmer, Donald R Songer•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Understanding court nominee evaluation and approval

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Lewis S Ringel•Political Behavior•1995

  • A Competing Risks Model of Supreme Court Vacancies, 1789–1992

    Open Access•Christopher J W Zorn, Christopher Zorn et al.•Political Behavior•2000

  • Giving Order to Districts

    Open Access•Georgia Kernell•Political Analysis•2009

  • Religion in the Legislative Arena

    Open Access•David Yamane, Elizabeth A Oldmixon•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Senator Opposition to Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Lawrence J Zigerell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • The Senatorial Courtesy Game

    Open Access•Tonja Jacobi•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Female and Minority Judicial Nominees

    Open Access•Nicole Asmussen, Nicole Jo Asmussen•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • The Impact of Party and Ideology on Roll‐Call Voting in State Legislatures

    Open Access•Shannon Jenkins•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • A Theory of Presidents' Public Agenda Setting

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2001

  • Vacancies, vetting, and votes

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2015

  • Nominations for Sale

    Open Access•Silvia Console-Battilana, Kenneth A Shepsle•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2009

  • Deference or Preference

    Open Access•Thomas H Hammond, Jeffrey S Hill•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1993

  • How uncertainty about judicial nominees can distort the confirmation process

    Open Access•Malcolm Sen, Maya Sen et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2017

  • Legislators' Personality Traits and Congressional Support for Free Trade

    Open Access•Scott Crichlow•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2002

  • Elections inWesternEuropean parliaments

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer•European Journal of Political…•2013

  • Lobbying with conflicting interests

    Open Access•Leif Helland•European Journal of Political…•2008

  • The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations

    Bryon J Moraski, Bryon Moraski et al.•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Supreme Court Appointments as a Move‐the‐Median Game

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel, Kieth Krehbiel•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947-1998

    Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Voting Against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation

    Open Access•Nathalie Giger, Heinrich Kluver et al.•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Lobbying for Justice

    Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Delaying Justice(s)

    Charles R Shipan, Megan L Shannon•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, Christopher J W Zorn et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Measuring Political Preferences

    Lee Epstein, Carol Mershon•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • The Public and the Supreme Court

    Roy B Flemming, B Dan Wood•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Marginality Hypothesis and Supreme Court Confirmation Votes in the Senate

    Robert J Mcgrath, James A Rydberg•Congress & the Presidency•2016

  • InstitutionalConflict andPerceivedPropertyRights inAppointmentPolitics

    David C Nixon•Congress & the Presidency•2014

  • Roll Call Votes on Cabinet Confirmations

    James D King, James W Riddeesperger•Congress & the Presidency•2006

  • The Changing Politics of Federal Judicial Nominations

    Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • The Nominations Presidents Make

    Artemus Ward•Congress & the Presidency•2001

  • The “New Normal” in Supreme Court Confirmation Voting

    Scott J Basinger, Scott Basinger et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2020

  • Confirmation Delay for Vacancies on the Circuit Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•David Nixon, David C Nixon et al.•American Politics Research•2001

  • Presidential Strategy in the Judicial Appointment Process

    Open Access•Lisa M Holmes, Lisa Holmes•American Politics Research•2007

  • Policy, Politics, and Public Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Stephen D Ansolabehere et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • Counting Congress In

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus, Chris Nicholson•American Politics Research•2010

  • The Changing Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations

    Open Access•Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•American Politics Research•2012

  • Who Drives the Ideological Makeup of the Lower Federal Courts in a Divided Government

    Open Access•Nancy Scherer•Law & Society Review•2001

  • Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas

    Open Access•L Marvin Overby, Beth M Henschen et al.•American Political Science Review•1992

  • Are Supreme Court Nominations a Move-the-Median Game

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec•American Political Science Review•2016

  • Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Pooled Time Series Analysis

    Lois W Sayrs, Lois Sayrs•Pooled Time Series Analysis•1989

  • The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments

    Christopher H Achen, Christopher Achen•Statistical Analysis of…•1986

  • Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting

    Sam Peltzman•The Journal of Law and Economics•1984

  • The Apparent Ideological Behavior of Legislators

    Joseph P Kalt, Mark A Zupan•The Journal of Law and Economics•1990

  • Self-Interest, Ideology, and Logrolling in Congressional Voting

    James B Kau, Paul H Rubin•The Journal of Law and Economics•1979

  • The Rationality of Ideology

    William R Dougan, Michael C Munger•The Journal of Law and Economics•1989

  • Service-Induced Campaign Contributions and the Electoral Equilibrium

    David P Baron•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1989

  • Advances in the spatial theory of voting

    James M Enelow, Melvin J Hinich•Advances in the Spatial Theory of…•1990

  • Presidential power

    Richard E Neustadt•Presidential power•1980

  • Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•John Wright, John R Wright•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Interest groups, campaign contributions, and probabilistic voting

    Open Access•David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith•Public Choice•1987

  • Issues and Parties in Legislative Voting

    Barry Bozeman, Duncan Macrae•The Western Political Quarterly•1971

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Sources of International Comparative Advantage

    Alasdair Smith, Edward E Leamer•The Economic Journal•1986

  • Presidential Vetoes and Congressional Response

    David W Rohde, Dennis M Simon•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data

    Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation

    Karen O''Connor, Karen O’connor et al.•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Spatial Models of Legislative Choice

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1988

  • The Analysis of Committee Power

    Keith Krehbiel, Douglas Rivers•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • Regression in Space and Time

    James A Stimson•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Localism in Presidential Elections

    Michael S Lewis-Beck, Tom W Rice•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Passing the President's Program

    Douglas Rivers, Nancy L Rose•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • The Relevance of Policy Values for the Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Donald R Songer•Law & Society Review•1979

  • A Method of Estimating the Personal Ideology of Political Representatives

    Open Access•Richard T Carson, Joe Oppenheimer et al.•American Political Science Review•1984

  • Farquharson and Fenno

    Open Access•Arthur Denzau, Arthur T Denzau et al.•American Political Science Review•1985

  • Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Albert D Cover et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Legislators and Interest Groups

    Open Access•Arthur T Denzau, Michael C Munger•American Political Science Review•1986

  • PACs, Contributions, and Roll Calls

    Open Access•John Wright, John R Wright•American Political Science Review•1985

  • Promise and Performance

    Open Access•Charles W Ostrom, Dennis M Simon•American Political Science Review•1985

Unique citing works99
Citations per year2,91
Citation span1992 - 2026 (35)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 98

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae