Confirmatory factor analysis and the factor structure of expagg in context
A reply to forrest et al., 2002
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11630450 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven Muncer (Durham University, corresponding author), Anne Campbell (0000-0002-8893-4320, Durham University) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 146-157 |
| Publication date | 2004-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Aggressive Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0096-140X • E-ISSN: 1098-2337 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ab.20011 |
| OpenAlex | W2058797396 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 28 |
It has been suggested that confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) can be used to investigate the construct validity of psychometric scales and Forrest et al. [2000] specifically query the factor structure of Expagg using this technique. In this paper we report unsuccessful attempts to confirm the factor structure of three widely used scales using CFA criteria. In the fourth study, a two‐factor model of Expagg, which has been derived from previous studies, is tested for fit on new data. The results suggest that from a CFA point of view, Expagg is best considered as two scales measuring expressivity and instrumentality with five items on each scale. This model satisfies four of the five fit criteria (CFI = 90, GFI = .94, RMSEA = .08, ECVI = .44), failing only on the chi square test, a benchmark that has attracted criticism from statisticians. Other concerns are raised about the meaning of CFA results and their importance. Aggr. Behav. 30:146–157, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc
Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · Psychometrics · Scale (ratio · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Mathematics · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods · Social Psychology
The feminine and masculine gender role stress — conclusions from Polish studies
Validation of a Community Collective Efficacy Scale in an African Context
Beliefs About Aggression in an Indian Sample
Ifas paper
Reason to Believe
Intent to harm or injure? Gender and the expression of anger
Gender differences in social representations of aggression
Psychometric analysis of the systemizing quotient (SQ) scale
A Mind Of Her Own
Testing Structural Equation Models
Who Believes in a Just World
The Importance of Distinguishing the Belief in a Just World for Self Versus for Others
A General Theory of Crime
Gender and aggressive behavior
Gender and aggressive behavior
Measuring Adolescent Depression
Maslach Burnout Inventory
Instrumental and expressive representations of aggression
Factor structure of the Expagg and Revised Expagg
Who Believes in a Just World
What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality
Models of anger and aggression in the social talk of women and men
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
Comparative fit indexes in structural models
Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory
Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,36 |
| Citation span | 2004 - 2013 (10) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |