Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Estimating the Standard Deviation From the Range

A Replication of Analysis of Demographic Data Reported in Marriage & Family Review , 2016-2017

Bibliographic Data

ID11637274
AuthorsW R Schumm (0000-0003-3097-3551, Kansas State University, corresponding author), Duane W Crawford (0000-0003-0048-2022, Kansas State University), Michael Higgins (0000-0002-5903-952X, Kansas State University), Lorenza Lockett (Kansas State University), Abdullah A A A Al‐Rashed (Kansas State University), Abdullah AlRashed (Kansas State University), Asma Bin Ateeq (Kansas State University)
Year2018
Volume54
Issue8
Pages777-792
Publication date2018-10-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarriage & Family Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0149-4929 • E-ISSN: 1540-9635
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01494929.2018.1500128
OpenAlexW2897959271
LanguageEN
References cited97

A major concern in the social sciences is lack of replication of previous studies. An important methodological concern in the social sciences is the ability to determine effect sizes in addition to statistical significance levels. Effect sizes cannot be easily calculated in the absence of sufficient data; usually standard deviations are needed. If standard deviations are not available, how can they be estimated? Various proposals have been offered to solve this question. One solution is to divide the range (maximum–minimum) by four; a variety of more complicated solutions, based on sample size or the skew of the variable’s distribution, have been suggested (Schumm, Higgins, et al., 2017). Here, 30 cases involving the demographic variable of age, from 23 articles published in Marriage & Family Review between 2016 and 2017, are assessed to replicate the previous report of Schumm, Higgins et al. (2017). Our results indicated that both linear and power functions significantly predicted the size of standard deviations, with larger samples featuring smaller standard deviations. Aside from sample size, the best solution appears to be to divide the range by 4.5–5.0; although for very small samples (N < 50), it is probably better to divide by 3.5–4.0 whereas for larger samples, especially those that involve higher levels of skew, it may be better to divide by 5.0 or higher. The Wan et al. (2014) estimation procedure appears to be approximately a power function of sample size. For samples up to several thousand in size, the range of divisors appears to run between 3.0 and 8.0, extremes that could be used to determine the largest or smallest possible standard deviations, respectively. Values far below 3.0 or above 8.0 may reflect typographical errors in data reports or possibly be evidence of artificially generated data, if not scientific fraud. When a variable is split into subsamples, its standard deviations should usually increase for the subsamples compared with the total sample. Similar assessments remain in progress for non-demographic variables in social sciences

Biology · Econometrics · Function (biology · Range (aeronautics · Replicate · Replication (statistics · Sample (material · Sample size determination · Skew · Standard deviation · Standard error · Statistics · Telecommunications · Variable (mathematics · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Computer Science · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Mathematics

  • Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology

    Open Access•Brian D Earp, David Trafimow•Frontiers in Psychology•2015

  • The Value of Direct Replication

    Open Access•Daniel J Simons•Perspectives on Psychological…•2014

  • On Replication in Communication Science

    Open Access•Bree Mcewan, Christopher J Carpenter et al.•Communication Studies•2018

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range

    Open Access•Xiang Wan, Wenqian Wang et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2014

  • Relationship Help-Seeking

    J Wade Stewart, Kay Bradford et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Effectiveness of Interventions for Grandparent Caregivers

    Beth McLaughlin, David Ryder et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Wanting “Something More”

    Adria J Dwyer, Lisa M Chauveron•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • The Far-Reaching Consequences of Job Insecurity

    Saija Mauno, Ting Cheng et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Single Parenthood, Parental Involvement and Students’ Educational Outcomes in Hong Kong

    A K L Cheung, Adam Ka-Lok Cheung et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Evaluation of the What's Real

    Scott P Gardner, James G Bridges et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Mediating Nations and Generations

    William Buse•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Relational Sacrifices about Intimate Behavior and Relationship Quality for Expectant Cohabitors

    M A Curran, Tricia J Burke et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • My Partner’s Media Use

    Preston C Morgan, Preston Morgan et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Effects of Network Approval on Accounts of Commitment Trajectories in Intraracial and Interracial Relationships

    James E Brooks, Brian Ogolsky et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • A Comparison Study of Low Trauma Disclosure Participants and Their Partners in Army Couples

    Kali Summers, Alyssa M Campbell et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Measuring the Effectiveness of Experiential Date Nights

    Naomi Brower, Linda Skogrand et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Understanding the Influence of Traditional Cultural Values on Indonesian Parenting

    Yulina Eva Riany, Pamela Meredith et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Complexities in Assessing Marital Beliefs

    Brian J Willoughby, Jamieson Egbert et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Single Motherhood and Children's Health and School Performance in Japan

    James M Raymo•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • From Holding Hands to Having a Thing to Hooking Up

    Rochelle L Rowley, Rochelle Rowley et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Children and Parents Deserve Better Parental Discipline Research

    Open Access•Robert E Larzelere, Marjorie Lindner Gunnoe et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Children of Homosexuals More Apt to Become Homosexual and Experience Parental Molestation

    Paul Cameron, P D Cameron et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • The Role of Grandparents in Single-Parent Families in Taiwan

    Wan-Chi Chen•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Meta-Analysis on the Roles of Fathers in Parenting

    William H Jeynes•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Conceptualizing Household Distribution of Labor from Feminist Theory

    Christopher A Maier, Candice A Maier•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Reply to Cameron et al

    W R Schumm, Duane W Crawford et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Drawing the Line

    Jerry L Cook, Randall M Jones et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Gender in the Midst of Reforms

    Ariane Utomo, Ariane J Utomo•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Researchers Deserve a Better Critique

    George W Holden, Andrew Grogan-Kaylor et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • High-Risk Sexual Behavior in Postmenopausal Women

    Katherine M Hertlein, Tara M Emmers-Sommer et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • The Effect of External Influences on Mate Selection Necessity Traits

    Ruoxi Chen, Jason P Austin•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Enrollment, Educational Expenditures and Work Among One-Parent Children in India

    Dhiman Das•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Is Less More? Number of Siblings and Frequency of Maternal Activities with Preschool Children

    Magdalena Osmanowski, Andrés Cardona•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Military Deployment of an Adult Child

    Janet R Crow, Janet Crow et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Continuity and Change in the Family System Across the Transition from Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood

    Anna K Lindell, Nicole Campione-Barr•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Antecedents and Consequences of Marital Satisfaction in an Emirati Sample

    Fatima R Al-Darmaki, Shaima Ahammed et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Living Arrangements of Single Parents and Their Children in South Korea

    H Park, Jaesung Choi et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • The Influence of Perceived Parenting Style and Contraceptive Self-Efficacy on College Student Contraceptive Use

    Eboni J Baugh, Eboni Baugh et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • I Was Like Damaged, Used Goods”

    Heather B MacIntosh, Heather MacIntosh et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Mothers’ Parenting Stress and Engagement

    M Blake Berryhill•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Associations of Parenting Dimensions and Styles with Internalizing Symptoms in Children and Adolescents

    Martin Pinquart•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • A Good Match? Offline Matchmaking Services and Implications for Gender Relations

    Sarah Knudson•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Characteristics of Couples Who Attend Family Services Counselor Visits in Relationship Education

    Ryan G Carlson, Jenene Case Pease et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Permission-Giving and Marital Infidelity

    Michelle M Jeanfreau, Michelle Jeanfreau et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Adolescent Marriage in Nepal

    Arjun Mani Guragain, Binita Kumari Paudel et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Sustaining Versus Losing Love

    Michelle L Duda, Raymond M Bergner•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Debatable Marriages

    Husain Al-Hakami, Kenneth Mclaughlin•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • A Retrospective Consideration of Recreational Family Storytelling Among Parents and Their Adult Children

    Kelly Gagalis-Hoffman, Ramon B Zabriskie et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Conflict or Divorce? Does Parental Conflict and/or Divorce Increase the Likelihood of Adult Children's Cohabiting and Marital Dissolution

    Constance T Gager, T Yabiku et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Why Do Women Want Children? The Case of Hong Kong, China

    Jacqueline Adams•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Mothers’ and Fathers’ Ratings of Parental Involvement

    Rebecca Folkman Gleditsch, Daphne E Pedersen•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Left Behind by Parents in China

    W J J Yeung, Wei-Jun Jean Yeung et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Family Structure and Economic Success Across the Life Course

    Robert I Lerman, Joseph P Price et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Lone Motherhood and its Educational Outcomes for Children in Vietnam

    Myriam De Loenzien•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • An Attempt in Modeling the Labor Supply Process of Married Women in Tunisia

    HajAli Dhouha•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Support Network Connectedness in the Lives of Community-Dwelling Rural Elders and Their Families

    Adrienne L Cohen, Colleen R Bennett•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • A Place for Technology in Parent Education

    Jennie Lynn Stanley, J M Vaterlaus et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Understanding Single Mothers’ Parenting Stress Trajectories

    M Blake Berryhill, Jared A Durtschi•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Fatherhood

    Ricky Finzi-Dottan, Orna Cohen•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • The Palestinian Family in Israel

    T Meler•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Reconfigured Everyday Lives of Children from Divorced-Parent Families in Singapore

    Sharon Ee Ling Quah, Quah Ee Ling•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Finding the Love Guru in You

    Jennifer G Rosier, James M Tyler et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Soldiers’ Experiences of Being Married and Serving in the British Army

    Mary Keeling, Charlotte Woodhead et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Mobile Phone Use in Romantic Relationships

    Audrey Juhasz, Kay Bradford•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • One-Parent Families in Contemporary Cambodia

    Patrick Heuveline, Savet Hong•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Dyadic Cross-Sectional Associations Between Depressive Mood, Relationship Satisfaction, and Common Dyadic Coping

    Kamel Gana, Yaël Saada et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Intimate Relationships of the Intellectually Gifted

    P Dijkstra, Dick P H Barelds et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • The Development and Validation of the Couple and Relationship Education Attitudes Index

    Brandon Burr, Brandon K Burr et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • PTSD and Physical Health Symptoms Among Veterans

    Kathrine Sullivan, Nicholas Barr et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • The Intergenerational Transmission of Financial Stress and Relationship Outcomes

    Daniel S Hubler, Brandon Burr et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • An Ecological-Transactional Model of Generational Boundary Dissolution Across Development

    Amy K Nuttall, Kristin Valentino•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Abilities in Romantic Relationships and Well-Being Among Emerging Adults

    R S Weisskirch•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Religious Dynamics and Marital Dissolution

    Benjamin T Gurrentz•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Growing Up in One-Parent Families in Asia

    W J J Yeung, Wei-Jun Jean Yeung et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Quantity and Quality

    Daphne E Pedersen•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Role of the Black Grandmother in the Racial Socialization of their Biracial Grandchildren

    Lover L M Chancler, Farrell J Webb et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Measuring Walsh’s Family Resilience Framework

    Crystal Duncan Lane, Peggy S Meszaros et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Veiling in Fear or in Faith? Meanings of the Hijab to Practicing Muslim Wives and Husbands in USA

    Zahra Alghafli, Loren D Marks et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • Integrative and Masking Emotion Work

    Krista Lynn Minnotte•Marriage & Family Review•2017

  • The Role of Friendship, Trust, and Love in Happy German Marriages

    V William Harris, Kasey Bedard et al.•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Survey Measures of Guan, Jiao, and Xiao

    Yudan Chen Wang•Marriage & Family Review•2016

  • Facts Are More Important Than Novelty

    Open Access•Matthew C Makel, Jonathan A Plucker•Educational Researcher•2014

  • Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean

    Scott E Maxwell, Michael Y Lau et al.•American Psychologist•2015

  • Replication, Replication

    Open Access•Gary King•PS Political Science & Politics•1995

  • The Desperate Need for Replications

    J E Hunter•Journal of Consumer Research•2001

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae