Popular but Poorly Defined
A Scoping Review of Youth Diversion Schemes
Bibliographic Data
This scoping review describes youth diversion schemes, with a key focus on how diversion is defined, implemented, and evaluated. We provide a narrative synthesis of 68 studies and examine key components of each diversion scheme, including: eligibility and exclusion criteria, timing of diversion, the mechanism of intervention, outcome measures and key findings. We identify which schemes appear most promising, while highlighting methodological limitations and gaps in the evidence base. Our analysis revealed that although diversion is widely endorsed as a way to reduce recidivism and to avoid the harmful effects of justice system contact, substantial variation still exists in how the concept is applied. Schemes differ not only in timing and intensity but also in their underlying aims—ranging from minimising justice system contact to addressing offending behaviour through to the provision of intensive interventions. This definitional ambiguity hinders evaluation and policy development. We recommend improvement across four key areas: (1) clarifying how diversion is defined and operationalised; (2) reconsidering the restrictiveness of eligibility criteria; (3) broadening outcome measures beyond recidivism; and (4) analysing program effects by diversion type and timing. Without greater consistency and transparency, it remains difficult for decision‐makers to identify and invest in effective diversion approaches
Ambiguity · Consistency (knowledge bases · Criminal justice · Key (lock · Outcome (game theory · Project commissioning · Recidivism · Restrictiveness · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Policing Practices and Perceptions
Children in Conflict with the Law
Youth Justice?
Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews
The Twelfth Jack Tizard Memorial Lecture
Risk factors for persistent delinquent behavior among juveniles
The Effect of Youth Diversion Programs on Recidivism
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Community sanctions in youth justice compared to other youth crime responses
Keeping kids in school through prearrest diversion
Preventing school-based arrest and recidivism through prearrest diversion
The costs of Indigenous and non-Indigenous offender trajectories
The punitive city
Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Trauma Among Young People Who Offend
Crime and Deviance in the Life Course
Youthful Discretion
“Since I went to the conference… I have really thought just how bad lighting fires are”
The Impact of Teen Court on Rural Adolescents
The Swansea Bureau
Juvenile Court and Contemporary Diversion
Love and compassion not found Elsewhere”
Gender differences in effects of teen courts on delinquency
Life‐course Trajectories of Different Types of Offenders
The End of the Age-Crime Curve? A Historical Comparison of Male Arrest Rates in the United States, 1985–2019
Scoping studies
Opportunities Diverted
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |