Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Domestic Politics of Nuclear Choices—A Review Essay

Bibliographic Data

ID11638151
AuthorsElizabeth N Saunders (0000-0001-5350-0138, Walsh University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume44
Issue2
Pages146-184
Publication date2019-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Security (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2889 • E-ISSN: 1531-4804
PublisherThe MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/isec_a_00361
OpenAlexW2982642437
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited51

When and how do domestic politics influence a state's nuclear choices? Recent scholarship on nuclear security develops many domestic-political explanations for different nuclear decisions. These explanations are partly the result of two welcome trends: first, scholars have expanded the nuclear timeline, examining state behavior before and after nuclear proliferation; and second, scholars have moved beyond blunt distinctions between democracies and autocracies to more fine-grained understandings of domestic constraints. But without linkages between them, new domestic-political findings could be dismissed as a laundry list of factors that do not explain significant variation in nuclear decisions. This review essay assesses recent research on domestic politics and nuclear security, and develops a framework that illuminates when and how domestic-political mechanisms are likely to affect nuclear choices. In contrast to most previous domestic arguments, many of the newer domestic-political mechanisms posited in the literature are in some way top-down; that is, they show leaders deliberately maintaining or loosening control over nuclear choices. Two dimensions govern the extent and nature of domestic-political influence on nuclear choices: the degree of threat uncertainty and the costs and benefits to leaders of expanding the circle of domestic actors involved in a nuclear decision. The framework developed in this review essay helps make sense of several cases explored in the recent nuclear security literature. It also has implications for understanding when and how domestic-political arguments might diverge from the predictions of security-based analyses

Autocracy · Democracy · Economics · Law and economics · Nuclear energy policy · Nuclear ethics · Nuclear power · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Scholarship · Timeline · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense

  • Nuclear Decisions

    Lisa Langdon Koch, Lisa Koch•Nuclear Decisions•2023

  • Making Democracy Safe for the World”

    Open Access•James Mackay•International Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Explaining South Korea’s Contrasting Nuclear Choices

    Open Access•In Young Min•Journal of Asian Security and…•2025

  • Structure amid change

    Mariana Budjeryn•Journal of Strategic Studies•2026

  • Preventive Nuclearization

    Open Access•Yang Gyu Kim, Sangmi Jeong•Journal of East Asian Studies•2025

  • Divisions at Home, Broken Promises Abroad? How Domestic Politics Shapes the United States’ Nuclear Credibility

    Open Access•Helen Webley-Brown, Lauren Sukin•International Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Firearms analogies and settler colonialism in US nuclear deterrence strategy

    Open Access•James Mackay, Jamie Levin•Security Dialogue•2025

  • A-Bomb for the People? When Leaders Cue the Public in Nuclear Decision-Making

    Open Access•Rebecca Davis Gibbons, Ariel Petrovics•Journal of Global Security Studies•2024

  • Holding All the Cards

    Open Access•Lisa Langdon Koch•Journal of Global Security Studies•2021

  • Rethinking the Deterrence-Disarmament Dichotomy

    Open Access•Lauren Sukin, J Luis Rodríguez et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2026

  • A theory of nuclear disarmament

    Open Access•Kjølv Egeland•Arms Control•2021

  • Nuclear weapons and interstate conflict behavior

    Open Access•Rizwan Asghar•Conflict Management and Peace…•2024

  • How leader's type shapes the effect of nuclear latency on dispute involvement

    Open Access•Benjamin M Jones, Benjamin Jones et al.•Conflict Management and Peace…•2023

  • Cheater's Dilemma

    Målfrid Braut-Hegghammer•International Security•2020

  • The rise of the autocratic nuclear marketplace

    Open Access•Nicholas L Miller, Tristan A Volpe•Journal of Strategic Studies•2023

  • Russian nuclear strategy and conventional inferiority

    Open Access•Kristin Ven Bruusgaard•Journal of Strategic Studies•2021

  • Deniability in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime

    Open Access•Reid B C Pauly•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Nuclearization and de-democratization

    Open Access•Thomas Fraise•European Journal of International…•2025

  • The Limits of Safety

    Open Access•Scott D Sagan•Limits of Safety•1993

  • On the Brink

    Open Access•Van Jackson•On the Brink•2018

  • Nuclear Logics

    Etel Solingen•Nuclear Logics•2007

  • Eisenhower's Scientists

    Open Access•Julia Macdonald•Foreign Policy Analysis•2013

  • The hidden rationality of Sweden's policy of neutrality during the Cold War

    Robert Dalsjö•Cold War History•2013

  • Why Hassan Rouhani Won Iran's 2013 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Clifton W Sherrill•Middle East Policy•2014

  • Almost nuclear

    Open Access•Matthew Fuhrmann, Benjamin Tkach•Conflict Management and Peace…•2015

  • Perils of Polarization for U.S. Foreign Policy

    Kenneth A Schultz•The Washington Quarterly•2017

  • Would U.S. Leaders Push the Button? Wargames and the Sources of Nuclear Restraint

    Reid B C Pauly•International Security•2018

  • On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics

    Kevin Narizny•International Security•2017

  • Why Japan Will Not Go Nuclear (Yet)

    Llewelyn Hughes•International Security•2007

  • Command and Control in Emerging Nuclear Nations

    Peter D Feaver, Peter Feaver•International Security•1992

  • Alliance Coercion and Nuclear Restraint

    Gene Gerzhoy•International Security•2015

  • Veto Players, Nuclear Energy, and Nonproliferation

    Jacques E C Hymans•International Security•2011

  • Politics over Promise

    Steven E Miller•International Security•1984

  • The New Era of Counterforce

    Keir A Lieber, Daryl G Pre et al.•International Security•2017

  • Let Us Now Praise Great Men

    Daniel Byman, Daniel L Byman et al.•International Security•2001

  • China's Search for Assured Retaliation

    M Taylor Fravel, Evan S Medeiros•International Security•2010

  • Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons

    Scott D Sagan•International Security•1996

  • Stalking the Secure Second Strike

    Austin Long, Brendan Rittenhouse Green•Journal of Strategic Studies•2015

  • Japan’s Nuclear Hedge

    Open Access•Richard J Samuels, James L Schoff•Political Science Quarterly•2015

  • The Senators’ Letter to Iran and Domestic Incorporation of International Law

    Open Access•Michael C Dorf•Political Science Quarterly•2016

  • Assuring Assured Retaliation

    Fiona S Cunningham, M Taylor Fravel•International Security•2015

  • The Ratification Premium

    Open Access•Sarah E Krep, Sarah E Kreps et al.•World Politics•2018

  • Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy

    Open Access•Gideon Rose•World Politics•1998

  • Bureaucratic Politics

    Open Access•Graham T Allison, Morton H Halperin•World Politics•1972

  • Domestic Revolutionary Leaders and International Conflict

    Open Access•Jeff D Colgan•World Politics•2013

  • When Leaders Matter

    Matthew Fuhrmann, Michael C Horowitz•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • The Determinants of Nuclear Force Structure

    Open Access•Erik Gartzke, Jeffrey M Kaplow et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2014

  • The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation

    Open Access•Sonali Singh, Christopher Way et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2004

  • Targeting Nuclear Programs in War and Peace

    Open Access•Matthew Fuhrmann, Sarah E Krep et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2010

  • Determinants of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation

    Open Access•Dong-Joon Jo, Erik Gartzke•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2007

  • Civil-military Pathologies and Defeat in War

    Open Access•Vipin Narang, Caitlin Talmadge•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2018

  • Studying Leaders and Military Conflict

    Open Access•Michael C Horowitz, Matthew Fuhrmann•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2018

  • Importing the Bomb

    Open Access•Matthew Kroenig•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2009

  • The Army You Have

    Open Access•Todd S Sechser, Elizabeth N Saunders•International Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Examining Explanations for Nuclear Proliferation

    Mark S Bell•International Studies Quarterly•2016

  • The Benefits and Burdens of Nuclear Latency

    Rupal N Mehta, Rachel Elizabeth Whitlark•International Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Recapturing Regime Type in International Relations

    Open Access•Susan Hyde, Elizabeth N Saunders•International Organization•2020

  • The Illusion of Democratic Credibility

    Open Access•Alexander B Downes, Todd S Sechser•International Organization•2012

  • Taking Preferences Seriously

    Open Access•Andrew Moravcsik, Andrew M Moravcsik•International Organization•1997

  • The Causes of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation

    Scott D Sagan•Annual Review of Political Science•2011

  • Making It Personal

    Open Access•Christopher Way, Jessica L P Weeks•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Avoiding Audience Costs

    Jonathan N Brown, Anthony S Marcum et al.•Security Studies•2011

  • Atomic Leverage

    Tristan A Volpe•Security Studies•2017

  • War and the Inner Circle

    Elizabeth N Saunders•Security Studies•2015

  • Nuclear Beliefs

    Rachel Elizabeth Whitlark•Security Studies•2017

  • Democratic Accountability and Foreign Security Policy

    Vipin Narang, Paul Staniland•Security Studies•2018

  • The MAD Who Wasn't There

    Brendan R Green, Austin Long•Security Studies•2017

  • Atomic Aversion

    Open Access•Daryl G Pre, Daryl G Press et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

  • Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes

    Open Access•James D Fearon•American Political Science Review•1994

Unique citing works18
Citations per year3
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 18

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae