Commentary on the special issue
New approaches to figurative language research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11638648 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Heather J Ferguson (0000-0002-1575-4820, University of Kent, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 103-111 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discourse Processes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-853X • E-ISSN: 1532-6950 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853x.2024.2314945 |
| OpenAlex | W4391993702 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 68 |
The papers in this Special Issue showcase some of the current work that aims to understand how people attribute meaning when speakers employ figurative language. Figurative language serves various communication goals, such as softening messages, enhancing politeness, and conveying criticism more subtly. However, misinterpretations are common due to the inherent conflict between direct and indirect messages. In this commentary, I provide a broader context to this work by couching the study of figurative language as an important and timely exploration of social language use, which is in turn influenced by new methodological approaches and challenges. I begin by reviewing how power dynamics influence the interpretation of language, including how cues to politeness (e.g. honorifics) vary based on social status and cultural context. The importance of language and culture in shaping interpretation of meaning is demonstrated in studies that have compared Western individualism with Eastern collectivism, or by comparing speakers with different levels of language proficiency (i.e. second language learners). Next, I review how the advent of technology and social media has transformed language use, requiring researchers to explore new methods and cues for communication. Finally, I discuss how future research could make use of methodological advancements, such as large-scale eye-tracking studies to analyze individual differences, and more diverse populations and developmental stages to advance our understanding of real-time language comprehension. Contributions of the articles in this Special Issue are featured throughout
Cognitive science · Linguistics · Literal and figurative language · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology
Politeness
Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing?
It's Fascinating Research
Why Do People Use Figurative Language?
Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence
The social brain in adolescence
The Origin of Cultural Differences in Cognition
Social Networks, Host Resistance, and Mortality
Culture and systems of thought
Frame analysis
Difficulties in Metaphor Comprehension Faced by International Students whose First Language is not English
Polite Speech Emerges From Competing Social Goals
Knowledge is a river and education is like a stairway
How reliable are individual differences in eye movements in reading
Emoji as a tool to aid the comprehension of written sarcasm
Mental chronometry of speaking in dialogue
Interpreting Figurative Statements
The Costs and Benefits of Metaphor
Muting the Meaning A Social Function of Irony
Memes in Digital Culture
The Function of Metaphor Modality in Memes on Jordanian Facebook Pages
Mind your own esteemed business”
Sarcasm in Written Communication
Metaphor in culture
Time Course and Neurophysiological Underpinnings of Metaphor in Literary Context
Processing of Written Irony
Getting it
Using Eye‐Tracking Measures to Predict Reading Comprehension
Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility
Neither Eastern nor Western
Politeness
Framing
Cultural Differences in Humor Perception, Usage, and Implications
Impoliteness revisited
Universals of linguistic politeness
The use and interpretation of addressee honorifics and plain forms in Japanese
The dynamics of politeness
Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese
Yes, but
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |