Theoria versus Poesis

Neoplatonism and Trinitarian Difference in Aquinas, John Milbank, Jean‐Luc Marion and John Zizioulas

Bibliographic Data

ID11655006
AuthorsWayne J Hankey (University of King's College, corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume15
Issue4
Pages387-415
Publication date1999-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Theology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0266-7177 • E-ISSN: 1468-0025
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-0025.00105
OpenAlexW2144931528
LanguageEN
Citations received41

The totality with which postmodern Christian theology asserts its right to proceed independently of philosophy is, in fact, philosophically situated and determined. Heidegger, primarily, defines theology's project by his narration of Western Fate in terms of onto‐theology. Two trinitarian differences are required of theologians who understand theology's situation thus: the first, associated with the procession of the Logos , requires getting beyond philosophy; the second, associated with the Spirit, requires getting beyond theology to poesis . Following Heidegger transforms theology into poesis and praxis . Beginning from a criticism of Aquinas implicit in a contrast made by Milbank between true trinitarian differential ontology and that possible from within Aristotelian categories like potency, act and actus purus , the paper considers what response might be made on behalf of medieval western philosophical theology and its development of trinitarian difference within theoria . The argument is that its union of Neoplatonic negative theology and metaphysics does not escape being onto‐theology but does provide genuine trinitarian difference

Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Logos Bible Software · Metaphysics · Neoplatonism · Philosophical theology · Postmodernism · Praxis · Theology · Trinitarian theology · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub