Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Open Pharma Movement

Social Action to ‘Open’ Drug Research and Its Implications for Health

Bibliographic Data

ID11923487
AuthorsNicole Foti (0000-0002-8812-8724, Stanford University, CA, USA, corresponding author)
Year2025
Pages3063127251386079-3063127251386079
Publication date2025-11-02
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Studies of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/03063127251386079
PMID41178235
OpenAlexW4415784292
LanguageEN
References cited41

Concerns over the complexity and costs of drug development have led some to consider whether practices of open science should be extended to pharmaceuticals, a space known for entrenched intellectual property regimes. In this article, I trace the emergence of collective action to apply open science to the research and making of drugs, an area I call open pharma . Drawing on in-depth interviews with open pharma leaders and document analysis of journal articles, organizational policies, and websites, I show that open pharma resembles other scientific/intellectual movements in developing new research practices and transmitting new ideas for sharing data. At the same time, the sociotechnical space of pharmaceuticals is deeply entwined in capitalist political economic structures (legal, regulatory, and financial markets) that shape how actors frame and organize their work. I identify key narratives that actors use to frame the movement and mobilize others, often drawing on market logics. I illustrate the active building and institutionalizing of open pharma infrastructure through the establishment of organizations and open science policies. And I describe structural barriers to open pharma in universities with publishing and commercialization imperatives-which are frequently translated into patent imperatives. 'Open' is often defined and operationalized in particular ways, prioritizing public data sharing of early research (which may later be privatized) over such interventions as public clinical trials and commercialization, raising the question of where, when, and for whom open pharma is beneficial

Action (physics · Best practice · Collective action · Commercialization · Intellectual property · Open Innovation · Operationalization · Politics · Sociotechnical system · Intellectual Property and Patents · Open Source Software Innovations · Research Data Management Practices

  • Biocapital

    Open Access•Kaushik Sunder Rajan•Biocapital•2006

  • Markets in the Making

    Michel Callon, Martha Poon et al.•Markets in the Making•2021

  • Pharmocracy

    Open Access•Kaushik Sunder Rajan•Pharmocracy•2017

  • Drugs for Life

    Joseph Dumit•Drugs for Life•2012

  • Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time

    Open Access•Michael Park, E Leahey et al.•Nature•2023

  • Assetization

    Open Access•Kean Birch, Fabian Muniesa•Assetization•2020

  • Patents and the challenge of ‘open source’ in an emergent biological commons or … the strange case of Betty Crocker and the mouse

    Open Access•Bronwyn Parry•BioSocieties•2020

  • Novel constitutions? New regimes of openness in synthetic biology

    Open Access•Stephen Hilgartner•BioSocieties•2012

  • Pharmaceutical innovation and its crisis

    Open Access•Jean-Paul Gaudillière•BioSocieties•2021

  • This is not an article

    Open Access•C M Kelty•BioSocieties•2012

  • Making valuable health

    Open Access•Jean-Paul Gaudillière, Kaushik Sunder Rajan•BioSocieties•2021

  • The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science

    Open Access•John Willinsky•First Monday•2005

  • Product development public–private partnerships for public health

    Open Access•Katia De Pinho Campos, Cameron D Norman et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • Addressing Health Care Disparities

    Open Access•Donald W Light•Frontiers in Sociology•2020

  • Ownership and sharing in synthetic biology

    Open Access•Jane Calvert•BioSocieties•2012

  • The future(s) of open science

    Open Access•Philip Mirowski•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • Capitalizing a Cure

    Open Access•Victor Roy•Capitalizing a Cure•2023

  • Market Failures and Market Framings

    Open Access•Geiger, Susi Geiger et al.•Organization Studies•2017

  • How Does One "Open" Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research

    Open Access•Nadine Levin, Sabina Leonelli•Science Technology & Human Values•2017

  • The Pharmaceutical Commons

    Open Access•Javier Lezaun, Catherine M Montgomery•Science Technology & Human Values•2015

  • Open Science and Closed Science

    Open Access•D E Chubin•Science Technology & Human Values•1985

  • Recent scientific/intellectual movements in biomedicine

    Open Access•Larry Au•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy

    Steven Peter Valla, P Valla et al.•Socio-Economic Review•2007

  • A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements

    Open Access•Scott Frickel, Neil Gro et al.•American Sociological Review•2005

  • Disciplining an Unruly Field

    Open Access•Lisa Stampnitzky•Qualitative Sociology•2011

  • Interdisciplinarity

    J A Jacobs, Scott Frickel•Annual Review of Sociology•2009

  • The Oncomouse That Roared

    Fiona Murray•American Journal of Sociology•2010

  • The Proper Copy

    Open Access•Cori Hayden•Journal of Cultural Economy•2010

  • Science, capitalism, and the rise of the 'knowledge worker

    Open Access•Daniel Lee Kleinman, Steven Peter Valla et al.•Theory and Society•2001

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae