The (un)making of electoral transparency through technology
The 2017 Kenyan presidential election controversy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11924617 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cecilia Passanti (0000-0003-2297-727X, University Paris Cité, Paris, France, corresponding author), Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle (0000-0001-6006-9761, University of Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris, France) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 928-953 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Studies of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/03063127221124007 |
| PMID | 36154350 |
| OpenAlex | W4297237074 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 41 |
Marked by the killing of a senior ICT professional working for the Electoral Commission and the invalidation of the presidential election by the Supreme Court, the 2017 Kenyan elections make for a good case through which to study how digital technologies shape contemporary electoral practice. This article examines the practice of electoral transparency through technology and argues that it can be conceived as a socio-technical device based both on distancing people from knowledge of the electoral infrastructure and on staging a simplified discourse on public access to the electoral infrastructure. Drawing on interviews with key actors in election technology implementation and ethnographic observations of public events around it, the article argues that digital technology has had three sets of implications for elections. First, it has shaped the electoral infrastructure and the nature of the final result (now a paper and digital hybrid). Second, it has shaped the distribution of knowledge among electoral professionals, giving a central role to ICT actors, objects, and knowledge in the definition of electoral transparency. Third, the centrality of ICTs in elections and the order of knowledge they bring are highly controversial and criticized by other electoral actors who demand for material proof for understanding the inner workings of elections
Distancing · General election · Information and Communications Technology · Kenya · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Public relations · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Law · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics
An intellectual history of digital colonialism
La fabrique de l’électorat. Pour une praxiographie de la participation politique au Cameroun
Réformer l’administration publique par l’informatique. Le cas du logiciel Sigipes au Cameroun
A Postcolonial Card Cartel
Trusting elections
Technicisation des registres de vote et participation matérielle au cameroun
Has Kenya democratized? Institutional strengthening and contingency in the 2022 general elections
Protecting the win, and securing the base
Multi-party Politics in Kenya (Eastern African Studies)
Election Watchdogs
Digital Democracy, Analogue Politics
Title unavailable
The Oxford Handbook of Kenyan Politics
Biometric State
The Tyranny of Transparency
Opening the Democracy Box
Making Democracy Count
Pandora's Ballot Box
The Anglo-Leasing corruption scandal in Kenya
Biometric voter registration
Kenya’s 2013 Elections
Digital dilemmas
Infrastructural state capacity for democratization? Voter registration and identification in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana compared
Biometrics and the disciplining of democracy
Voting Technologies
Sleight is right
Biomaîtriser les identités ? État documentaire et citoyenneté au tournant biométrique
La fabrique du vote
Censorship or self-control? Hate speech, the state and the voter in the Kenyan election of 2013
The localmwananchihas lost trust
Election Day
Election Technology, Disputes, and Political Violence in Kenya
ICT and Elections in Nigeria
Judicialisation of politics and Kenya's 2017 elections
Digital Unbounding of the Polling Booth
Does the use of a biometric system guarantee an acceptable election's outcome? Evidence from Ghana's 2012 election
Digital futures and analogue pasts? Citizenship and ethnicity in techno-utopian Kenya
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |