An unknown known
Knowledge, preferences, and acceptance of the Common Agricultural Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11929802 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matteo Zavalloni (0000-0002-6291-7653, University of Urbino, corresponding author), Giacomo Salvarani (0000-0003-0891-4459, University of Urbino), Elena Viganò (0000-0002-5764-9113, University of Urbino) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 140 |
| Pages | 103082-103082 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Food Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-9192 • E-ISSN: 1873-5657 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103082 |
| OpenAlex | W7142828661 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
Despite its importance for the agricultural sector, little is known about the extent to which the general public understands and knows the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), and how such (lack of) knowledge shapes their policy preferences. This paper investigates the role of factual knowledge of the CAP in influencing Italians’ support for and acceptance of the policy. Relying on original survey data ( N = 1002 ) representative of the Italian population, we first assess citizens’ factual knowledge of the CAP’s central function (providing subsidies to the agricultural sector, rather than imposing taxes on it or having no policy at all). We then examine how knowledge affects preferences over budget allocations across policy goals. In addition, we conduct an information provision experiment, randomizing information about the environmental conditionality of CAP subsidies, to test its effect on public acceptance of the policy. We use multinomial logistic regression to analyze budget allocation preferences and ordered logistic regression to examine the determinants of CAP acceptance . Our results show that Italians generally exhibit acceptance of the CAP, but respondents with correct knowledge display preferences that move away from income support toward other policy goals. Moreover, information about environmental conditionality of the CAP significantly increases its acceptance, particularly among individuals with environmentally conscious consumption habits. These findings highlight the importance of policy knowledge and communication in shaping public opinion on EU-level agricultural policies.
Agricultural communication · Agricultural policy · Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Common Agricultural Policy · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Organic Food and Agriculture
Understanding Tax Policy
Cognitive burden of survey questions and response times
Designing Information Provision Experiments
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Information effects in public spending preferences
Ecological citizens and consumers
Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes
Agriculture and environment
Citizens’ perceptions of agricultural policy goals—evidence from Switzerland
The impact of decoupled payments on farm choices
Valuing cultivated land protection
Between capital investments and capacity building—Development and application of a conceptual framework towards a place-based rural development policy
Does EU rural expenditure correspond to regional development needs
Promoting change or preserving the status quo? The consequences of dominating local politics by agricultural interests
Public preferences for landscape features
Public preferences for post 2020 agri-environmental policy in the Czech Republic
European Rural Development under the Common Agricultural Policy's ‘Second Pillar’
Is the European Union too complicated? Citizens’ lack of information and party cue effectiveness
Consumer support of policy measures to increase sustainability in food consumption
Europeans’ Attitudes Toward the Goals of Agricultural Policy
Information effects and mass support for EU policy control
Stories or Science? Facts, Frames, and Policy Attitudes
Facts and Myths about Misperceptions
Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |