Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding Gender

Some Implications for Science and Technology

Bibliographic Data

ID11935958
AuthorsJ Hearn (0000-0002-9808-1413, Linköping University, corresponding author), Liisa Husu (0000-0002-1681-0724, Örebro University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume36
Issue2
Pages103-113
Publication date2011-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInterdisciplinary Science Reviews (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-0188 • E-ISSN: 1743-2790
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1179/030801811x13013181961301
OpenAlexW2155228623
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited49

Gender relations and gendered power relations are major defining features of science and technology. This article addresses the question of how to understand gender, and considers their various implications for science and technology. Gender and gender relations can be understood as operating and as relevant to science and technology at several levels: who does science and technology; how science and technology are organized; and the con- struction of knowledge in science and technology. We review five underlying formulations that inform both policy interventions and theorizing around gender and science — gender based on sex; masculinity/femininity and sex roles; categoricalism, structure and plural structures; poststructuralist, discursive and deconstructive approaches; the material-discursive

Epistemology · Femininity · Gender relations · Linguistics · Masculinity · Plural · Power (physics · Sociology · Career Development and Diversity · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies

  • The gendered nature of independence in the context of research funding and excellence

    Open Access•Helene Schiffbaenker, Marita Haas et al.•SN Social Sciences•2022

  • Female lens in urban mobility

    Open Access•Marcia Cassitas Hino, Maria Alexandra Viegas Cortez Da Cunha et al.•Information Technology and People•2021

  • The Masculine Figure of a University Rector in the Narratives of Polish Female Academic Leaders

    Open Access•Dominik Antonowicz, Anna Pokorska•Higher Education Quarterly•2025

  • Feminising Innovation

    Open Access•G Griffin•Feminist Encounters A Journal of…•2021

  • Ciencia, estereotipos y género

    Open Access•Santiago Vazquez, Susana Vázquez-Cupeiro•Convergencia Revista de Ciencias…•2015

  • Negras in tech

    Open Access•Dulcilei C Lima, Tatiana Santos Oliveira•Cadernos Pagu•2020

  • Three sides to every story

    Open Access•Jenny Lieu, Alevgul H Sorman et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Juliet Webster, Wing-Fai Leung et al.•New Technology Work and Employment•2017

  • In academia there is still, at least in Latin America, the hegemony of men’

    Open Access•Constanza López Radrigán, Marcela Tenorio Delgado•Feminist Theory•2026

  • Gender and transition in climate governance

    Open Access•Annica Kronsell•Environmental Innovation and…•2013

  • The double standard

    Margrit Eichler•The double standard•1979

  • Scientific elite

    Harriet Zuckerman•Scientific elite•1977

  • Shaping technology/building society

    John Law, Wiebe E Bijker•Shaping technology/building society•1992

  • Gender inequality

    Judith Lorber•Gender inequality•2001

  • The gender of oppression

    Jeff Hearn•The gender of oppression•1987

  • Gender

    Suzanne J Kessler, Wendy Mckenna•Gender•1985

  • Men and women of the corporation

    Rosabeth Moss Kanter•Men and women of the corporation•1977

  • Paradoxes of gender

    Judith Lorber•Paradoxes of gender•1994

  • Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations

    Jeff Hearn, Jeff R Hearn et al.•Gender, Sexuality and Violence in…•2001

  • This Sex Which is Not One

    Open Access•Luce Irigaray•Feminisms•1977

  • Has Feminism Changed Science?

    L Schiebinger•Figurationen•1999

  • Studies in ethnomethodology

    Harold Garfinkel•Studies in ethnomethodology•1984

  • Gendering organizational analysis

    Albert J Mills, Peta Tancred•Gendering organizational analysis•1992

  • Conceptual Practices Power

    Dorothy E Smith, Smith Smith•Conceptual Practices Power•1997

  • The science question in feminism

    Sandra G Harding•The science question in feminism•1986

  • The Psychology of Sex Differences

    Eleanor Emmons Maccoby, Carol Nagy Jacklin•The Psychology of Sex Differences•1974

  • Crip Theory

    Robert Mcruer, Michael Bérubé•Crip Theory•2022

  • Why So Slow

    Virginia Valian•Why So Slow•1999

  • In the Way of Women

    Open Access•Cynthia Cockburn, Jo Campling•In the Way of Women•1991

  • In the Way of Women

    Cynthia Cockburn•In the Way of Women•2019

  • ‘Bodies that Matter’

    Judith Butler, Janet Price et al.•Feminist Theory and the Body•1999

  • Sex, Gender and Society

    Ann Oakley•Sex, Gender and Society•2016

  • Gender Trouble

    Judith Butler•Gender Trouble•2011

  • Materialist Feminisms

    Open Access•Nilüfer Isvan•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2007

  • Crip Theory. Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability

    Open Access•Robert Mcruer•Scandinavian Journal of…•2008

  • Naming Men as Men

    Open Access•David Collinson, J Hearn•Gender Work and Organization•1994

  • The Politics of Reproduction

    Open Access•Cecilia Benoit, Mary O’brien•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1983

  • The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science

    Open Access•Margaret W Rossiter•Social Studies of Science•1993

  • Men, power, and the exploitation of women

    Open Access•Jalna Hanmer•Women s Studies International Forum•1990

  • Women, Power, and Politics

    Lynne B Iglitzin, Margaret Stacey et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1982

  • Men and Women

    J Bernard, John Nicholson•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1985

  • Meeting the Universe Halfway

    Karen Barad•Meeting the Universe Halfway•2006

  • Men in the public eye

    Jeff Hearn•Men in the public eye•1992

  • Sexing the body

    Anne Fausto-Sterling•Sexing the body•2000

  • The sex/gender distinction

    Anne Edwards•Australian Feminist Studies•1989

  • Feminist theories of technology

    Judy Wajcman•Cambridge Journal of Economics•2009

  • Sciences from Below

    Caren Kaplan, Sandra Harding et al.•Sciences from Below•2008

  • Using Gender to Undo Gender

    Open Access•Judith Lorber•Feminist Theory•2000

  • From Hegemonic Masculinity to the Hegemony of Men

    Open Access•J Hearn•Feminist Theory•2004

  • Getting Real

    K Barad•differences•1998

  • Primate Visions

    Donna J Haraway•Primate Visions•2013

  • Theorising Patriarchy

    Open Access•Walby, Sylvia Walby•Sociology•1989

  • The Complexity of Intersectionality

    Leslie Mccall•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2005

  • Theorizing men and men's theorizing

    Open Access•J Hearn•Theory and Society•1998

  • Toward a new sociology of masculinity

    Open Access•Tim Carrigan, Bob Connell et al.•Theory and Society•1985

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,77
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae